|
|

Latest Column:
A
Change That’s Not for the Better
The Sad Subtext of “The 40 Year Old Virgin”...
..........

CaliforniaRepublic.org
opinon in
Reagan country
..........

Dubious
Sources
Curious
and suspect documents...
..........

Michael Ramirez
editorial cartoon
@LA Times
..........
Do your part to do right by our troops.
They did the right thing for you.
Donate Today 
.......... ..........

tOR Talk Radio
Contributor Sites
Laura
Ingraham
Hugh Hewitt
Eric
Hogue
Sharon
Hughes
Frank
Pastore
[Radio Home] ..........

Current
Headlines
..........
|
|
Unborn
Pain
Denying abortion reality...
[Fr.
Frank Pavone] 8/17/05
It is therefore
declared to be the policy of the United States that the slaughtering
of livestock and the handling of livestock in connection with
slaughter shall be carried out only by humane methods."
Those words
come from the "Humane Methods of Slaughter Act," a law that
expresses our concern for the pain experienced by animals,
but that more fundamentally expresses a dimension of our own
humanity. In Australia, the national Health and Medical Research
Council requires painkillers to be used on the fetuses of
animals!
So what about human fetuses?
Contributor
Fr.
Frank Pavone
Fr.
Frank Pavone is National Director, Priests
for Life [go to Pavone index] |
On April
6, 2004, the following testimony was given in U.S. District
Court (District of Nebraska) by Dr. Kanwaljeet Anand before
Judge Richard G. Kopf in the case of Leroy Carhart, M.D., et.
al. v. Ashcroft
Q. So,
Doctor, do you have an opinion as to whether the partial-birth
abortion procedure causes pain to the fetus?
A. If
the fetus is beyond 20 weeks of gestation, I would assume
that there will be pain caused to the fetus. And I believe
it will be severe and excruciating pain caused to the fetus.
Q. What
do you mean by severe and excruciating pain?
A. You
see, the threshold for pain is very low. The fetus is very
likely extremely sensitive to pain during the gestation of
20 to 30 weeks. And so the procedures associated with the
partial-birth abortion that I just described would be likely
to cause severe pain, right from the time the fetus is being
manipulated and being handled to the time that the incision
is made, and the brain or the contents, intracranial contents,
are sucked out."
In 1994,
an article in the prestigious British medical journal, the
Lancet, revealed hormonal stress reactions in the fetus. The
article concluded with the recommendation that painkillers
be used when surgery is done on the fetus. The authors wrote, "This
applies not just to diagnostic and therapeutic procedures on
the fetus, but possibly also to termination of pregnancy, especially
by surgical techniques involving dismemberment." In 1991,
scientific advisors to the Federal Medical Council in Germany
had made a similar recommendation.
In August
2001, Great Britain's Medical Research Council concluded that
pain perception may be as early as 20 weeks; other studies
place it as early as 10 weeks.
It should
be noted that each year in the United States alone, over 18,000
abortions take place at 21 or more weeks of pregnancy.
The Unborn
Child Pain Awareness Act has now been introduced in Congress,
to inform women having abortions at 20 weeks or more that their
baby may feel pain. The legislation deserves our support. It
would require that the mother be given the option to provide
painkillers to her baby. This is not to justify abortion, but
will certainly make many think twice about it.
Many abortion
supporters will, of course, continue to deny reality. As Bertrand
Russell wrote, "A fisherman once told me that fish have neither
sense nor sensation, but how he knew this, he could not tell
me." tOR
copyright
2005 Priests for Life
§
|
|