|
|
Contributor
Anthony P. Archie
Anthony
P. Archie is a public policy fellow in Business and Economic
Studies. Prior to joining Pacific
Research Institute, Anthony earned his masters
degree in public policy from Pepperdine University, specializing
in economics and regional/local policy. As part of his
graduate work, he co-authored Crisis in California: Reforming
Workers’ Compensation, a proposal that drew praise
from an esteemed panel of scholars and policy advisors.
Mr. Archie has held internships on Capitol Hill and in
the State Assembly. He received his B.A. in economics and
political science from Pepperdine University. [Archie index]
Pension
Intervention
CalPERS eats the budget...
[Anthony P. Archie] 12/20/04
With
a looming budget deficit of $7.3 billion, California needs to adopt more cost-saving
measures. Changing the state’s pension system would be an excellent place
to start.
California’s Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) provides pensions
to 1.4 million former state employees. These retirees receive benefits under
a “defined benefit” plan, where pension amounts are guaranteed by
the state based on a combination of salary and years of service. Under this scenario,
an employee with 30 years on the job, making $50,000 a year, can retire at age
55 and receive an annual pension of $30,000, or 60 percent of his or her original
salary.
The state’s public safety officers get an even better deal. At 50, they
can retire with 90 percent of their working income. While these benefits are
very attractive to state employees, the taxpayers are left with the bill.
CalPERS receives its funding from payroll contributions by both the employee
and the employer (state agencies funded by taxes). Those funds are then invested
in the stock market under the supervision of a 13-member board. Ideally, the
returns on the invested funds should cover the promised benefits to retirees,
leaving taxpayer dollars untouched. Recently, that has not been the case.
From 2001 to 2003, the investments under-performed and CalPERS suffered severe
shortfalls, forcing taxpayers to pick up the tab. In 2004, CalPERS ran a deficit
of $1.9 billion. The governor and the legislature are attempting to defer a portion
of this by selling $800 million in bonds, a move that the Pacific Legal Foundation
claims is unconstitutional.
While bonds may dull the pain, they won’t change the reality that the CalPERS
deficit consumed 1.7 percent of the state’s budget. With projections stating
that retirement related costs should increase by $1 billion over the next five
years, things aren’t looking good. The pension problem is worse for California’s
counties and cities.
The city of San Diego’s pension system has only enough funds to cover 68
percent of its obligations. Contra Costa County allocates 11 percent of its budget
to pensions, while the city of Bakersfield is at 14 percent. There are literally
dozens of localities that face bankruptcy if something isn’t done.
Last week, Assemblyman Keith Richman (R-Granada Hills) introduced a constitutional
amendment to change how California’s public pension systems operate. His
plan would limit all new employees hired after July 1, 2007 to a “defined
contribution” pension plan. This 401k-like plan would require the public
agency to match an employee’s contribution up to a specified amount.
Rather than have the funds managed by the government, the individual employee
would be able to invest these funds however he or she wishes. In addition, the
pension would be portable, allowing the employee to take the plan with them if
they move into the private sector.
A defined contribution pension system allows for fiscal stability. With the success
of the investments placed squarely on the employee, the public no longer has
to foot the bill during under-performing years. State and local governments would
be unchained from pension deficit obligations, freeing up dollars to repay debt
and balance the budget.
Next fiscal year’s state budget deficit is estimated to be $7.3 billion.
If California is ever going to dig out of its fiscal hole, budget reform must
occur. The public pension system is an excellent place to begin. CRO
§
|
|