|
Home | Notes
Contributors
Archives | Search
Links | About
..........
Julia Gorin
 The America Show
Episode 4
Jesus and Mordy
Watch Video Now
..........

Conservatives Are From Mars, Liberals Are From San Francisco
by Burt Prelutsky
.........

America Alone
by Mark Steyn
..........

..........
The
CRO Store
..........

..........
|
|
THORNTON |
Hamas
Vs. The West
by Bruce
S. Thornton [author,
academic] 5/18/06 |
The drama
being played out between Hamas and the West grows stranger
by the minute, exposing the cultural toxins that are weakening
our resolve in the fight against jihad. The murderous aims
of Hamas are clear, as their spokesmen and sympathizers do
not hesitate to remind us. Nor is their commitment to jihad
against Israel and the West a minority obsession of a lunatic
fringe. Just recently the religious leaders of several Muslim
countries issued a statement of support for the goal of Hamas
to drive Israel into the sea: “The right to historical
Palestine is an eternal right, and no soul can relinquish it,
neither in an agreement, a document or a promise.” They
added that nobody can ban “jihad for the liberation of
Palestine” or “damn the jihadists.”
And contradicting
those Westerners who still believe the whole crisis is about
Palestinian nationalist aspirations, a Sudanese cleric said, “Palestine
is a religious issue, not just a political one, and affects
all Muslims.” A representative for Hamas agreed: “This
meeting has reverted the Palestinian issue to its rightful
depth as an Arab and Islamic issue.” The upshot of the
declaration is that there will be no “land for peace,” no
recognition of Israel’s right to exist, no signing on
to “roadmaps” or other desperate Western attempts
to avoid facing one simple fact: Israel is the beleaguered
Western salient in the front-lines of the war against jihad.
Yet even
as Hamas and the religious leadership of Muslim nations tell
us their intentions, we Westerners refuse
to listen. Instead
of facing the existential threat to our way of life, we continue
to wring our hands over the hardships of the Palestinian people,
with the result that our refusal to allow Western money into
the hands of murderers gets ever more wobbly. Despite the fact
that Hamas was democratically elected, which means that a critical
mass of Palestinian Arabs agree with Hamas’ aims, we seem
to think the Palestinians are somehow being held hostage by some
alien ruling clique. Having created the myth of large numbers
of Palestinians willing to accept Israel and merely wanting a
state of their own, we ignore the mountains of evidence––the
Palestinians dancing in the streets after 9/11, the ubiquitous
posters idolizing homicide bombers, the preschool pageants replete
with three-year-olds wrapped in toy explosive belts–– suggesting
that such moderates are few. Nor will we accept that years of
support for the corrupt thug Arafat, and now for the terrorist
faction Hamas, reveal a widespread willingness on the part of
many Palestinians to endure political, economic, and social dysfunction
as an acceptable price to pay for holding on to their bitter
hatred of Israel.
The most absurd response to the cut-off of funds
to these terrorists, who want to destroy not just Israel but
us as well, is that we
are “punishing” the Palestinians for their democratic
choice. We forget that the flip side to democratic choice is
responsibility for that choice. During our own Civil War, Southerners
made a democratic choice to secede from the Union and test their
right to do so by force of arms. The Confederate soldiers in
the field were sustained in their fight by the moral and material
support of their families back home, who wrote them letters of
encouragement, held public rallies and celebrations honoring
them, and worked on farms and factories providing them with food
and weapons.
General Sherman understood this dynamic between
soldier and civilian, and conceived his March to the Sea as
a psychological
as well as military action: “I propose to demonstrate the
vulnerability of the South and make its inhabitants feel that
war and individual ruin are synonymous terms,” he wrote.
So too in a letter to the mayor of Atlanta: “Now that war
comes home to you, you feel very different. You deprecate its
horrors, but did not feel them when you sent carloads of soldiers
and ammunition, and molded shells and shot, to carry war into
Kentucky and Tennessee, to desolate the homes of hundreds and
thousands of good people who only asked to live in peace at their
old homes, and under the Government of their inheritance.”
As hard as life has been for some Palestinians
because of their support for terrorists, continuing Western
aid over the years,
and continuing Western restraint of Israel at the expense of
her citizens, have both propped up Palestinian society just enough
to keep Palestinians from feeling the full consequences of their
stubborn hatred of Israel and refusal to acknowledge with deeds
rather than mere words Israel’s right to exist. So too
has the West’s willingness to accept empty declarations
and carefully hedged “condemnations” of terrorism
on the part of so-called moderates like the terrorist Mahmoud
Abbas. After Oslo was followed by the intifada, after the great
refusal at Camp David, only the most deluded or naïve could
fail to see the duplicity of these protestations routinely contradicted
whenever Arafat spoke in Arabic. Agreements and summits and road
maps were all mere tactical feints that had nothing to do with
the permanent long-term strategic goal of destroying Israel.
Yet here we go again, demanding that a terrorist
organization make insincere, tactical statements so we can
hang on to our
pretense that a Palestinian state will solve the whole crisis,
and that Israel’s refusal to sacrifice its citizens and
its existence is the prime mover of Muslim discontent with the
West. Apparently we didn’t learn our lesson from Arafat
and the P.L.O., who did precisely what we are demanding Hamas
do: pretend to accept Israel’s right to exist and to abjure
terrorism, all the while that the strategic goal of Israel’s
destruction continues to be pursued, with terrorism when tactically
necessary. So far Hamas refuses to play that rhetorical game.
Perhaps they think that with the U.S. engaged in Iraq and confronting
a belligerent Iran, they have the opportunity to take a more
aggressive tack. And no doubt they are banking on the European
instinct for appeasement and its deep-seated dislike of Israel
to shake loose the money that will continue to prop them up.
And it seems their gamble will pay off. Fig-leaf
mechanisms for getting money to the Palestinians are already
in the works.
The failure of Hamas to act like a legitimate government will
be papered over with Western money, just as the Palestinian Authority’s
failure and corruption were. Money being fungible, funds that
should go to schools and hospitals and economic development will
go to weapons, explosives, and the salaries of armed gangs. The
contempt of the jihadists for Westerners who will subsidize those
eager to destroy them will grow only more intense, and their
conviction that they will ultimately prevail will be held only
more firmly.
Which all means that a resolution to the crisis
is more distant, and the dead on both sides will continue to
multiply. Imagine
if, in 1864, Sherman’s plans to hasten the end of the war
and the dying had been derailed by Northern and English concerns
that Southerners should not be made to suffer. Imagine that Northern
and English money had been channeled to the South, because Northerners
were troubled at the thought that ordinary Southerners, most
of whom didn’t own slaves, were in distress because of
the ideals of the plantation-owning minority. How much longer
would that conflict had gone on, and how many more men North
and South would have died? And what greater chance would there
had been that the South would have prevailed and the Union be
left divided?
The war against jihad will never be won until Muslims themselves
are convinced that jihad will fail. If there are indeed large
numbers of moderate Muslims who want to adapt their religion
to a modern, interconnected world run on principles of secular
law and human rights, then they have to step up and act in ways
that demonstrate this desire. But this will never happen until
the West makes it clear that terrorist jihad in the pursuit of
lost Islamic grandeur is a dead end that will bring only suffering
and ruin. Unfortunately, in the case of Israel for forty years
we have not only failed to show that the wages of jihad is death
and failure, but we have indulged, subsidized, and rewarded terrorism.
If one dime of Western money is sent to the Palestinians while
an elected terrorist organization is in control, we will be doing
so again. CRO
copyright
2006 Bruce S. Thornton
Searching for Joaquin
by Bruce S. Thornton
|

Greek Ways
by Bruce S. Thornton
|
Bonfire of the Humanities
by Victor Davis Hanson, John Heath, Bruce S. Thornton
|

Plagues of the Mind
by Bruce S. Thornton
|
Eros: The Myth of Ancient Greek
Sexuality
by Bruce S. Thornton
|
§
|
|
|