Contributors
Daniel Pipes- Contributor
Daniel
Pipes is director of the Middle
East Forum, a member of the
presidentially-appointed board of the U.S.
Institute of Peace,
and a prize-winning columnist for the New York Sun and The
Jerusalem Post. His most recent book, Miniatures:
Views of Islamic and Middle Eastern Politics (Transaction
Publishers) appeared in late 2003. His website, DanielPipes.org,
the single most accessed source of information specifically
on
the Middle East and Islam, offers an archive and a chance
to sign-up to receive his new materials as they appear. [go
to Pipes index]
The
Saudis' Covert P.R. Campaign
Spinning the media…
[Daniel Pipes] 8/16/04
A range
of public figures—former ambassadors, university
professors, think tank experts – routinely opine in America
about the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia while quietly taking Saudi
funds. They learnedly discuss Arabian affairs on television,
radio, in public lectures, and university classrooms. Having
no visible connection to Saudi money, they speak with the authority
of disinterested U.S. experts, enjoying more credibility than,
say, another billionaire prince from the royal family.
Saudi funding for opinion makers has been known but not its
exact specifics. I can for the first time expose how the Saudis
manage their covert publicity campaign in America thanks to a
Saudi-employed public relations firm having incautiously contacted
a senior professor at a major research institution. Although
the professor did not accept the offer of the speakers, he showed
enough interest to document the proposed transaction and then
made the details available to me.
An employee at a leading public relations firm in Washington
offered the professor Saudi-funded speakers for the lecture program
he runs, doing so as part of a program to provide ongoing education
to communities around the country about "the importance
and value of strong U.S.-Saudi relations. … One of our
campaign components is to implement a speaker's bureau program
on behalf of the Kingdom that reaches into target markets across
the nation. I think there is a wonderful opportunity," she
gushed, "to develop a very stimulating event with [your
speakers' series]."
The letter invites further inquiries, with the p.r. employee
adding eagerly that she is "available to come speak with
you in person if possible." The letter then lists five lecturers
ready to speak on the Saudi tab. They make for an interesting
group.
Walter
L. Cutler and Richard W. Murphy – two former U.S.
ambassadors to Saudi Arabia. Like too many others who served
in Riyadh, Cutler and Murphy have translated their government
service into apologizing for the Saudis. Their actions are all
too typical of Americans who deal with Riyadh in their high-level
official capacity and then take Saudi funds to promote Saudi
interests.
Sandra
Mackey – a free lance writer who makes
statements to the media like, "The only thing that is holding Saudi
Arabia together today is the House of Saud with its strength
and its shortcomings. The worst thing the United States could
do is go after the House of Saud."
Mary
E. Morris – a staffer at the Los Angeles World Affairs
Council who praises
the kingdom as "one of the U.S.'s staunchest
allies and oldest friends in the Middle East" and ascribes
anti-American public opinion in Saudi Arabia and the Middle East
to American actions alone – "the U.S. invasion of
Iraq without international validation and the lack of a strong
U.S. support of an unbiased settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian
conflict."
Samer
Shehata – an assistant professor of politics at
Georgetown University who unabashedly lauds Riyadh in the media: "the
Saudis have been staunch allies. And it's absurd really to characterize
them in any other way," he said on MSNBC in April
2002. "I
don't think that the Saudis are trying to hide anything," he
added on MSNBC in July
2003. "Saudi Arabia is our ally. … I
think that the Saudi regime, certainly the royal family is the
ally of the United States, and they have been the ally of the
United States for quite some time. … since 9/11 the Saudis
have really done a huge amount in terms of getting on top of
charities, limiting money flows, arresting people."
Because the professor can pay only modest honoraria, he inquired
about funding these speakers and was assured that the university
need not pay any of their honoraria or expenses. The Saudis would,
via the p.r. firm, handle these pesky matters.
The Saudis are engaging in an underhanded propaganda campaign
that subverts the U.S. debate concerning Arabian issues. It is
vital to prevent such corruption, especially on the delicate
issue of Riyadh's self-proclaimed role as America's "friend" in
the war against Islamist terrorism. To do so, editors, journalists,
radio and television producers, think tank directors, and speaker-series
hosts need to ascertain that whoever deals with Saudi issues
is not on that country's dole. A simple question, "Are you
receiving funds from Saudi Arabia," should do the trick.
Aug. 13, 2004 update: For the Saudi response to this article,
the professor's reply, and my analysis, see http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/305. CRO
This piece
first appeared in the New York Sun
copyright
2004 Daniel Pipes
§
|