|
Home | Notes
Contributors
Archives | Search
Links | About
..........
Julia Gorin
 The America Show
Episode 4
Jesus and Mordy
Watch Video Now
..........

Conservatives Are From Mars, Liberals Are From San Francisco
by Burt Prelutsky
.........

America Alone
by Mark Steyn
..........

..........
The
CRO Store
..........

..........
|
|
FELLOW
TRAVELER |
The
Will to Fight Terror
by Daniel
Mandel [commentator/analyst]
8/8/06 |
Thirty
years ago on the night of July 3rd and morning of July 4th
in 1976, Israeli commandos flew into the heart of Africa
to the old terminal building at Uganda's Entebbe Airport
and in a lighting operation freed 103 hostages.
Some
250 passengers had been hijacked a week earlier aboard Air
France Flight 139 en route from Athens to Paris by the Marxist-Leninist
PLO faction, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine
(PFLP). Once in control of the plane, the terrorists diverted
the flight to Idi Amin's bloodthirsty dictatorship, after
refueling supplied by the already veteran terrorist regime
of Libya's Muammar Gaddafi. The terrorists gradually released
most passengers, retaining only those with Israeli passports
or Jewish surnames plus the Air France crew of Captain Michel
Bacos, who refused to abandon any of his charges.
The
German and Arabs hijackers this was a comradely joint project
of Baader-Meinhof and the PLO demanded the release of jailed
Palestinian terrorists in an assortment of Israeli and European
jails and threatened to start murdering the hostages if their
demands went unmet. With the passengers captive in the middle
of a seemingly inaccessible African tyranny, there was no
reason to suppose anyone, the Israelis included, would have
any choice but to cave in.
Instead,
only hours before the deadline, Israeli commandos flew the
2,500 miles to Uganda in four C-130 Hercules military transport
planes, taking the terrorists and their Ugandan enablers
entirely by surprise. The terminal building holding the hostages
was stormed, seven of the ten terrorists were killed, along
with about 40 Ugandan soldiers, and all but four hostages
were safely spirited away. The Israelis neutralized Amin's
air force to avoid a catastrophic pursuit by Ugandan pilots,
eleven of their MIG jets being destroyed on the ground. All
Israeli commandos returned alive but for their field commander,
Lieutenant-Colonel Yonatan Netanyahu.
A
United Nations Security Council debate had achieved little
but it did at least provide a platform for a denunciation
against the terrorists and their supporters by Israel's UN
Ambassador, Chaim Herzog, while Israel basked perhaps for
the last time in international acclaim and sympathy for resolutely
fighting terrorism. No international police action had procured
the hostages release and no one had been able to offer Israel
more than tea and sympathy. As so often before, the Israelis
had demonstrated that they relied on no one except themselves
to fight for their own.
How
much has changed in thirty years. Today Israel acts neither
so boldly nor swiftly. A case in point is presently before
our eyes for months, Israel has been attacked on its own
soil by hundred of rockets since unilaterally relinquishing
Gaza to the Palestinian Authority. Part of what once fired
Israeli determination never to deal with terrorists was the
fear that doing so would cause their demands to escalate
to the point of having to abandon strategic territory just
to redeem Israeli captives. Today, Israel unilaterally cedes
for nothing what it would not have yielded previously for
hostages' lives while enduring yet more rockets, bombings,
fatalities and kidnappings.
Changes
in Israeli behavior and, one suspects, morale reflect a different
international environment. Today's world is one in which
Western publics are so inured to the incidence of terrorism
that increasingly, no single outrage is deemed worthy of
decisive response. Worse, however, is the moral confusion
that preceded it. In a remarkable borrowing from the dead
ideology of Soviet communism, it is today possible to convince
large segments of Western publics, five years into a war
on Islamist terrorists, that the US really is motivated to
occupy Iraq in order to seize its oil and that the West is
the greatest misfortune to befall the earth.
Cultural
relativism also plays its hand, ordaining automatic self-justification
for terrorist acts, the more gruesome and larger, so the
reasoning goes, the more cogent must be the justifications.
This is but an adjunct of the widespread inability to call
evil by its name. If one society may not judge another's
acts, than justifications for those acts must be found and
validated. Thus, the propensity to find real or contrived "root
causes." With this intellectual corrosion follows the false
standardization of evil, which becomes something to be seen
everywhere but fought nowhere.
To
be sure, much of these same Western publics deplore the nihilistic
leveling of their own societies to the level of their assailants,
but the mood is undeniably different. One index: can we really
expect to see three films, or even one, on the elimination
of masterterrorist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi? As it is, it took
Hollywood five years to produce Flight 93. It did
not take Hollywood until 1946 to produce its first World
War Two film. Whereas American journalists never thought
twice to don US military uniforms in that conflict, their
successors today seriously ponder the propriety of wearing
American lapel-pins.
Films
dealing with terrorism today are likely to celebrate less
the success or importance of counter-terrorism than call
it into question as moral issue. Instead of a Raid on
Entebbe, we are more likely to get a Munich. Sophisticates
might see this as tribute to our ability, once apparently
lacking, to empathize across cultures and to rigorously examine
ourselves. In fact, Raid on Entebbe is largely factual
whereas Munich is largely factitious. The resultant
tendentiousness is but one price we pay for the ravages of
moral confusion. Redeeming clarity that can inspire and celebrate
a counter-terrorist victory, in the manner the world once
celebrated Entebbe, is needed before the West, Israel first,
others later, face a real Munich. CRO
This piece
first appeared at Front Page Magazine
copyright
2006 Daniel Mandel
§
|
|
|