Sign Up for
Google Alerts!

theOneRepublic
content headlines
sent out every day
email us to sign up

 


 

 

 


Latest Column:
Stopping the Meltdown
What Beltway Republicans Need To Do

..........


CaliforniaRepublic.org
opinon in
Reagan country

..........


..........


Jon Fleischman’s
FlashReport
The premier source for
California political news

..........


Michael Ramirez
editorial cartoon
@Investor's
Business
Daily

..........

Do your part to do right by our troops.
They did the right thing for you.
Donate Today

..........

..........

..........


tOR Talk Radio
Contributor Sites
Laura Ingraham

Hugh Hewitt
Eric Hogue
Sharon Hughes
Frank Pastore
[Radio Home]

..........


 

Contributors
Carol Platt Liebau - Columnist

Carol Platt Liebau is editorial director and a senior member of tOR and CRO editorial boards. She is an attorney, political analyst and commentator based in San Marino, CA, and has appeared on the Fox News Channel, MSNBC, CNN, Orange County News Channel, Cox Cable and a variety of radio programs throughout the United States. A graduate of Princeton University and Harvard Law School, Carol Platt Liebau also served as the first female managing editor of the Harvard Law Review. Her web log can be found at CarolLiebau.blogspot.com [go to Liebau index]

A Cosmetic Crusade Against Girl Scout Cookies
...And Some Real Discussion About Childhood Obesity

[Carol Platt Liebau] 3/21/05

No doubt in an effort to raise our awareness of another important health news story, the mainstream media has alerted us that “critics” are attacking . . . the Girl Scouts. Well, not the Girl Scouts exactly – just their cookies.

One of the “critics” is Michael Jacobson, the executive director of the Center for Science in the Public Interest (those friendly folks who report on the artery-clogging propensities of every delicious junk food ranging from movie popcorn to Mexican). Jacobson insists that there must be a “healthier alternative” to the Girl Scout cookies.

The other critic, a New York chef named Ann Cooper, insists, “We’re in the midst of an obesity pandemic and for children who are overweight – [with obesity and diabetes – it’s unbelievable. And here we have a group that sells hundred of millions of cookies.”

Well. There’s really no dispute that we are confronting a troubling upsurge in childhood obesity. Two-thirds of American adults are overweight or obese – and rates are climbing even faster in children. Some experts believe that today’s metastasizing childhood obesity could actually result in a decline in life expectancy for Americans over the next decades to come.

So there’s no doubt something needs to be done to encourage children to eat healthfully and engage in exercise (you know, “play”). But is it really helping the “cause” to condemn the Girl Scout cookie – the biggest source of funding for an organization that is committed to promoting “strong values, leadership skills, social conscience, and conviction about their own potential and self-worth” among young girls?

And in an age when many also identify an epidemic of eating disorders among young women, is it really wise to send the message that, while some foods are “good,” others are so “bad” that they ought to be banned? Might this not present an optimal moment for teaching about the virtues of moderation and portion control, instead?

In the end, this silly, manufactured controversy about Girl Scout cookies – whatever its outcome – does little to shed any light on the real issue. It’s not how children get fat (pretty much the same way adults do!), but why. And for some provocative but well-reasoned answers on that score, check out Mary Eberstadt’s new book, Home Alone America. There, building on this Policy Review article from February of 2003, she points out that the upsurge in child obesity actually correlates well with the exodus of mothers from the home to the workplace.

Eberstadt notes (and backs with research) the fact that children spend more time on the computer or watching television when their mothers aren’t around. Simple exercise for children is more difficult to ensure when the children are in daycare – where, as Eberstadt points out, snacks are a given, but exercise is an option. Even breastfeeding during the first year of life – virtually impossible for many working mothers, who are back at the job within three months of giving birth – has been proven to reduce the likelihood of obesity later in life. And it’s intuitively obvious that children are likely to eat more – and to eat less healthfully – when there’s no adult around to cast a watchful eye on after-school snacking.

Obviously, many mothers work – not because they want to – but because they feel that they have to. Equally obvious is the fact that there is a certain genetic component to certain children’s tendency to carry extra weight.

But one thing’s certain: The difficult and growing problem of childhood obesity can’t be solved (or even intelligently addressed) through cosmetic crusades against institutions like the Girl Scout cookie. And those who actually care about remedying the child obesity problem – rather than simply seeing their faces on television – understand the importance of listening to people like Eberstadt, who are willing to look for the causes of the epidemic, rather than simply supplying facile, and superficial “responses” to it.

A meaningful debate on the causes of and solutions for child obesity – now that would be a real story. Too bad it’s just not good television. tOR

Columnist Carol Platt Liebau is a political analyst, commentator and theOneRepublic / CaliforniaRepublic.org editorial director based in San Marino, CA. Ms. Liebau also served as the first female managing editor of the Harvard Law Review. Her web log can be found at CarolLiebau.blogspot.com

copyright 2005

§

 
freedompass_120x90
Monk
Blue Collar -  120x90
120x90 Jan 06 Brand
Free Trial Static 02
2004_movies_120x90
ActionGear 120*60
VirusScan_120x60
Free Trial Static 01
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
Applicable copyrights indicated. All other material copyright 2003-2005 theOneRepublic.com