|
Contributors
Carol Platt Liebau - Columnist
Carol
Platt Liebau is editorial director and a senior member of
the CaliforniaRepublic.org editorial
board. She is an attorney, political analyst and commentator
based in San Marino, CA, and has appeared on the Fox News
Channel,
MSNBC, CNN, Orange County News Channel, Cox Cable and a variety
of radio programs throughout the United States. A graduate
of
Princeton
University
and Harvard Law School, Carol Platt Liebau also served as the
first female managing editor of the Harvard Law Review.
[go to Liebau index]
The
Law of the Playground
…And the Perils of “Girlie Man” Bipartisanship
[Carol
Platt Liebau] 7/19//04
Watching
Democratic legislators criticize Arnold Schwarzenegger for
calling them “girlie men” is a bit like being
back on a grade-school playground. That’s where little
children discover for the first time that some people just don’t
like them – and there’s really nothing they can do
about it. As Democrats press their attack, this may turn out
to be a pivotal moment in the political education of Arnold Schwarzenegger – and
a cautionary tale for any other Republican public servant who
believes that political conflict can somehow be transcended through
the force of personality.
After a promising
start, the Governor has run into the intractable political
difficulties that face any Republican seeking to govern
California. Negotiations with the Indians about their monopoly
on casino gambling, which was supposed to yield a greater return
to the rest of the state, have stalled. And Democrats, eager
to force a Republican governor to raise taxes, have balked at
passing the Governor’s budget, despite early projections
that it would be completed on time.
Now, the Governor – understandably frustrated with the
Democratic legislature – has gone over their heads to the
people, calling his adversaries “girlie men,” an
allusion to a popular “Saturday Night Live” skit
that actually mocked him. And as inevitably as the sun rising
in the east, the usual suspects have stepped forward to take
offense, insisting the term is somehow sexist and homophobic.
It’s not. It’s just a funny catchphrase that two
comedians used to ridicule anyone without a “pumped up” physique – which
pretty much includes every elected official in America. But the
outcry about it shows that the Democrats have resorted to their
old standby playbook – if you can’t win on the facts
of a policy public debate, it’s time to create a new one
by being “offended” by some alleged act of “insensitivity.”
No one could blame
the Governor for being surprised at the onslaught. This wasn’t
the way it was supposed to be for him. Just months ago, stories
emerged about the rapport he had built across
the aisle, a particular contrast to the universal dislike for
his predecessor, Gray Davis. For a while, it seemed as though
good, old-fashioned collaboration had somehow descended on Sacramento;
concord, not division, had suddenly become the order of the day.
But as with most illusions,
the daydream of political unity has been dispelled by the cold,
hard light of reality. And that,
perhaps, isn’t such a bad thing. Republican politicians
who enter the public arena late in life too often seem to cherish
the conviction that partisan difficulties can be transcended
easily through nothing more than a demonstration of good will
on their side. Witness George W. Bush coming to Washington, D.C.
determined to “change the tone,” as a “united,
not a divider” – working with Teddy Kennedy on “No
Child Left Behind” and consulting Tom Daschle on post-9/11
strategy.
Look where that got
him. Republicans’ desire for comity
with Democrats is understandable, but it is naïve. Because
they represent the party of government, Democratic politicians
will always take outraged umbrage when their political power
is dwarfed by that of Republicans. And they will fight back with
whatever weapons are in their arsenal, resorting at last to allegations
of racism, sexism and homophobia.
In contrast, despite
the heated dialogue of their ideological compatriots on talk
radio, Republican politicians actually do
make the occasional stab at bipartisanship, which in practice
frequently means conceding to Democratic demands – if for
no other reason than that it will guarantee them at least temporarily
favorable press coverage. And more often than not, striving for
a rapprochement becomes a mistake in both political and policy
terms – as George W. Bush could likely attest today.
There is no reason
that relationships between the members of different parties
cannot be cordial. And political discourse
should always be civil. But big disagreements arise from the
fact that big issues – and big principles – are at
stake. And so for Arnold Schwarzenegger and any other Republican
leaders who are tempted to believe that partisanship is nothing
more than just a big misunderstanding, it’s time for a
wake-up call: Political differences are just the law of the playground. CRO
Columnist
Carol Platt Liebau is a political analyst, commentator and
CaliforniaRepublic.org editorial director based in San Marino,
CA.
copyright
2004
§
|