|
Home | Notes
Contributors
Archives | Search
Links | About
..........
Julia Gorin
 The America Show
Episode 4
Jesus and Mordy
Watch Video Now
..........

Conservatives Are From Mars, Liberals Are From San Francisco
by Burt Prelutsky
.........

America Alone
by Mark Steyn
..........

..........
The
CRO Store
..........

..........
|
|
FELLOW
TRAVELER |
Who
Won in Lebanon?
by J. F. Kelly, Jr. [writer]
8/22/06 |
It
is commonly asserted even in the United States that we lost the
war in Vietnam. Well, not really. The United States was hardly
vanquished and, in fact
was inflicting heavy losses in the final battles before “Vietnamization” of
the conflict. No sensible person seriously doubts that the U.S. could have
decisively defeated the Hanoi regime had it been willing to expend the
necessary effort, take the gloves off and risk confrontation with China.
It is more
accurate to say that our expeditionary forces failed to achieve
the desired outcome in that conflict. The fault, of course,
lay with the prosecution of the conflict and micromanagement
by Washington civilians and civilianized generals. Still, the
legend persists that we lost the war. Victory and defeat are
often in the eye of the beholder.
Contributor
J.F. Kelly, Jr.
J.F.
Kelly, Jr. is a retired Navy Captain and bank executive
who writes on current events and military subjects.
He is a resident of Coronado, California. [go to Kelly index] |
So it is
in Lebanon. Hezbollah and most of the Arab and Muslim street
are celebrating
victory in the wake of the Israeli troop
withdrawal from southern Lebanon. Iran’s leading lunatic
has credited Hezbollah with a massive victory for Islam, leaving
little doubt that he regards the conflict as part of a greater
religious war.
Some victory! Southern Lebanon is in ruins and Hezbollah suffered
substantial losses. Israeli troops were not defeated but withdrew
in compliance with a UN cease fire resolution. Nevertheless,
the Arab and Muslim world made lemonade out of these lemons by
declaring a major victory over Zionism and American policy in
the Middle East.
Where does the truth lie? Somewhere in the murky middle. In
the global war on terrorism, there are mostly losers. Victories
are often measured by who lost the least. In Lebanon that still
remains to be seen. Clearly, Lebanon lost the most, its infrastructure
in the south reduced to rubble. It paid the price for sheltering
terrorists and allowing them free reign over part of its territory
and to participate in its government. Hezbollah, by just surviving
and remaining a continuing danger to Israel achieved a victory
of sorts. So did its patrons, Iran and Syria, the former benefiting
by the diversion of world attention from its continuing nuclear
enrichment program in defiance of the UN and the western world.
Hamas and the Palestinians were losers, too. Palestinian can
forget their hopes for an independent state in the foreseeable
future. Israel has enough threats to deal with without another
hostile state nearby, free to breed suicide bombers and lob rockets
at its cities.
Amid banners planted
amid the rubble and unexploded ordinance reading “Made in the USA”,
Hezbollah seized the moment on the world stage to lead the
cleanup and reconstruction effort.
Returning Lebanese praised them as defenders of the land. Sentiment
against the United States ran strong. Hezbollah may have been
temporarily weakened militarily but in the Muslim world its prestige
and image soared as the first Arab force to survive a conflict
with Israel without being totally routed. Everything is relative
and perception is often what matters most. Polls throughout the
Muslim countries and even among European Muslims showed large
percentages blaming Israel and the United States for the conflict.
Aid poured in from the oil rich Arab and Muslim countries, dwarfing
that from western countries, increasing bitterness toward the
West.
Israel has emerged
from yet another crisis, resigned to the probability that more
will follow. Hezbollah and Hamas remain
dedicated to its destruction. Israel also remains convinced of
the futility of negotiating with terrorists. Would you sit down
to negotiate with someone who wants to kill you and your family?
How does one begin such a dialogue? Do you say, “May we
discuss your refusal to recognize my right to exist?’ Or
as a recent political cartoon put it, “Is there any wiggle
room on that position?”
Comes now the UN peacekeeping force to hold hands with the
Lebanese Army to create a buffer zone; just as soon, that is
as they can round up enough volunteers. But first they had better
decide what their mission entails and what rules of engagement
they will follow when fighting breaks out again. It is dangerous
to venture into to such an area, protected only by what everyone
knows is a fragile cease fire agreement. Could the UN forces
disarm Hezbollah? Is the Lebanese Army capable of asserting control
over the Hezbollah-dominated south? Might as well send in a few
troops of Boy Scouts, augmented by the Keystone Cops.
Will rockets rain
again on Israeli cities? Does anyone really have any doubt?
What, after all, has changed? Certainly not Hezbollah’s
hatred of Israel. Meanwhile, Iran’s threats against Israel
grow more ominous as it races to acquire nuclear weapons.
What will Israel do to defend itself? Why, the same thing we
would do under the circumstances. Whatever it takes. CRO
copyright
2006 J. F. Kelly, Jr.
§
|
|
|