|
Home | Notes
Contributors
Archives | Search
Links | About
..........
Julia Gorin
 The America Show
Episode 4
Jesus and Mordy
Watch Video Now
..........

Conservatives Are From Mars, Liberals Are From San Francisco
by Burt Prelutsky
.........

America Alone
by Mark Steyn
..........

..........
The
CRO Store
..........

..........
|
|
FELLOW
TRAVELER |
Insufficient
Outrage
by J. F. Kelly, Jr. [writer]
6/29/06 |
Beheadings
in Iraq were back in the news but only briefly, except for
some of the perpetually angry conservative radio talk show
hosts, whose anger, unfortunately, often taints their judgment
and renders their solutions too extreme by far. The mainstream
media, on the other hand, rapidly disposed of the news regarding
the unspeakable atrocities committed by fanatic Iraqi insurgents
against two more of our soldiers and the story faded quickly
from the news and opinion columns.
That’s
a pity because the world needs to reflect somewhat longer on
the barbaric behavior of these insurgents, referred to by some
opponents of the war as freedom fighters. People everywhere,
whatever their position on the war, need to ponder the evil
being committed by Muslim extremists in the name of Allah.
It should cause acute embarrassment, indeed, outrage, to true
Muslims everywhere that their religion has been hijacked and
disgraced by these animals.
Contributor
J.F. Kelly, Jr.
J.F.
Kelly, Jr. is a retired Navy Captain and bank executive
who writes on current events and military subjects.
He is a resident of Coronado, California. [go to Kelly index] |
Privates
Thomas L. Tucker and Kristian Menchaca were captured and tortured
by
Iraqi insurgents who then cut their heads off
and so horribly mutilated their corpses that they could be identified
only by DNA. It is devastating enough to lose a loved one or
a comrade in arms. It is more than doubly devastating to learn
that the loved one or comrade was tortured and mutilated beyond
recognition. Rage would be an understandable reaction among fellow
warriors after such events and the urge for revenge strong but,
of course, we’re expected always to be above all that by
critics of the war, sitting in the comfort and safety of their
homes.
The perpetrators of
such evil deeds, like the suicide bombers who target innocent
civilians, are savages. They don’t
deserve to be called insurgents. Nor are they combatants, entitled
to the protections of those Geneva Conventions that the war critics
ceaselessly prattle about. They are simply terrorists who are
driven by religious fanaticism to hatred, barbarism and murder.
Fanatics cannot be reasoned with or brought to justice. There
are only two certain ways of protecting civilized people from
the murderous fanatics who are targeting them: they must be killed
or incarcerated for life, away from civilized people, in some
secure place like Guantanamo. Since this is probably too much
for the American civilian justice system to deal with reliably,
it is perhaps best left to military tribunals.
Those with extreme positions on either side of the Iraq War
responded to this atrocity with predictably extreme recommendations.
Some talk show hosts demanded that our military members being
held on charges of murdering or abusing Iraq civilians or prisoners
be immediately set free as if one crime justifies another. On
the other side, some opponents of the war saw this atrocity as
just another argument for immediate withdrawal.
They are both wrong, of course. Those who demand that charges
be dropped against members of the military suspected of having
committed offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice
(UCMJ),even without a full investigation, are as guilty of rushing
to judgment as are those who demand that heads role without complete
knowledge of the facts and circumstances. The military takes
allegations of wrongdoing very seriously. There are standard
procedures for conducting investigations to determine whether
or not the available evidence supports charges and trial by court-martial.
Members of the military found to be in violation of the Uniform
Code of Military Justice must answer for their offenses as determined
by military regulations and the Manual for Courts-martial. Atrocities
committed by an enemy do not justify illegal behavior on our
part. That said, however, the circumstances and mental state
of the defendants engaged in combat with an often unseen and
unrecognizable enemy must be taken into account. My experience
with the military justice system persuades me that the process
will be fair and just, and will not be improperly influenced
either from above or from outside the service.
Those who argue for
immediate withdrawal or a firm timetable for withdrawal are
equally misguided. We are engaged in a war
against terrorists who despise and wish to kill us. It will likely
be fought on many fronts and for a long time. If we weren’t
fighting it in Iraq and Afghanistan, we’d be fighting it
somewhere else. These terrorists are not trying to kill us because
of where we are but rather because of who we are. That may not
change much even after we withdraw from Iraq.
What Americans and the world need to learn from such atrocities
as this is the true nature of the enemies we face and how we
must deal with them. We will not defeat them by attempting to
bring them to justice. Justice no more applies to fanatics like
these than it does to vermin. It is not a matter of determining
an appropriate sentence for them. Civilized people must be protected
from them. Nor will we melt their hearts by reaching out to them
and negotiating with them. Remember, they hate us for who we
are and what we stand for, not what we say or how we act. You
cannot negotiate with religious fanatics who believe that they
honor God by torturing, killing and decapitating infidels and
mutilating their bodies. CRO
copyright
2006 J. F. Kelly, Jr.
§
|
|
|