The
Minimum Wage Calamity
The issue is not wages, it’s jobs…
[Ray Haynes] 1/4/06
As the year
begins, we find Sacramento once again considering raising the
minimum wage. Only this time, Governor Schwarzenegger has indicated
he might support
a bill raising the minimum wage to $7.25 next year, and $7.75 the year
after.
In the wake
of high energy costs, high building costs, high liability insurance
costs, and workers’ compensation reform that doesn’t
reduce costs nearly as much as we need to, we cannot afford
to drive up the costs of doing business in California even
higher. Even if you do not pay the minimum wage to more than
a handful of employees, the inflationary impact it has on the
entire salary scale can be significant.
Contributor
Ray Haynes
Mr.
Haynes is an Assembly member representing Riverside
and Temecula. He serves on the Appropriations and
Budget Committees. [go to Assembly Member Haynes website
at California Assembly][go to Haynes index] |
The current
federal minimum wage is $5.15 per hour. In California the minimum
wage is $6.75 per hour. Left
wing political rhetoric
has succeeded in confusing the people into thinking that a ‘wage’ is
an entitlement, not the price that the worker is worth in the
marketplace for the job performed, the skills possessed, or the
desirability of the worker to the employer. I think it is time
we remind ourselves that wages are, in fact, a price paid for
labor.
Everyone is familiar with the harmful economic effects of arbitrary
government price controls in other aspects of the economy. Rent
control results in fewer rental units. Price control on any goods
results in fewer of those goods. Price control on labor results
in fewer jobs.
It is an
emotionally charged issue, which fails to take into account
the ‘side effects’ of the
law. If an employer has to pay an employee more than that employee
produces for the
company, the employer is losing money. So either the employee
is fired, or the company goes bankrupt. Either way, the employee
loses the job. This is government forced unemployment.
A forced minimum wage deprives the workplace of some lower
skilled workers who would be capable of rendering beneficial
services to an employer if that employee were allowed to be paid
what his effort was worth, making that employee a productive
member of society. The worker has been deprived of independence
and self-respect which comes from self-support, even though he
or she would otherwise be willing to do the work at a lower wage.
Even worse, the best way to get a higher paying job is to do
well at a lower paying job.
According
to an analysis produced by the National Center of Policy Analysis, “The primary cause of low income, …,
is no wages, not low wages.” They conclude that most of
those who earn low wages are either teen-agers or other secondary
earners spread rather evenly across the income distribution scale.
According to a summary of their analysis, “While the single
mother trying to support her child on a full-time minimum wage
job is a better story, the 16-year-old hamburger-flipping student
with college-educated and employed parents is a better fact.” Low-income
families have a large number of people without jobs and without
the skills to get a job. A mandated minimum wage forces them
even further out of the job market.
Increasing the minimum wage increases the cost of goods and
services, forcing many of the people who lost their jobs as a
result of this government intervention to either pay higher prices,
or do without. The government has deprived them of a job they
could perform, and which would form the basis of further training
to acquire higher wages, and has increased the price of goods
that they might otherwise have been able to buy. All of this
is sold to the public in the name of helping the poor. Some help!
Low-income
families do not benefit from a minimum wage, and neither does
the taxpayer. Once again we will consider
increasing
the cost to employers in California for a program that has never
shown any legitimate long-term benefit to “the poor”,
and that has far more often been shown to be a detriment not
only to employers, but to the very “poor” the program
is supposed to help. After all, you can only make the minimum
wage if you have an employer who is providing a job. -CRO-
Mr.
Haynes is a California Assembleyman representing Riverside
and Temecula and frequent contributor to CaliforniaRepublic.org.
§
|