|
|
Contributor
Ray
Haynes
Mr.
Haynes is an Assembly member representing Riverside and
Temecula.
He serves on the Appropriations and Budget Committees. [go to
Assembly Member Haynes
website at California Assembly][go to Haynes index]
A
Titanic Bureaucrat
State’s education head and the ill-fated captain...
[Ray
Haynes] 2/2/05
When the
Titanic sunk, many blamed Captain Edward John Smith for the
severe
loss of life. He was an able captain with forty
three years of experience on the high seas. He had been captain
of the Olympic prior to his service on the Titanic, and in that
role, had run into a submerged wreck (losing a propeller) and
nearly hit another ship. The White Star Line put him in charge
of the Titanic anyway, since he’d otherwise had an otherwise
long and stellar career (“other than that, how did you
like the show, Mrs. Lincoln?”).
Smith, however, made
several mistakes in his handling of the Titanic. He went too
fast, a common practice at the time. That
speed contributed to the damage. When he tried to avoid the iceberg
by turning the ship, he couldn’t move the ship fast enough
and actually increased the damage that the iceberg did to the
hull of the ship. Had he rammed the iceberg or gone slower, chances
are the Titanic would have survived. But Captain Smith chose
to follow the common wisdom of the time by going as fast as the
ship would go and turning to avoid the iceberg. The rest is history.
There is no question
that California’s education system
is looking a lot like the Titanic, and there is also no question
that our current Superintendent of Public Instruction, Jack O’Connell,
has a lot of experience in the education world. In the Senate,
Superintendent O’Connell chaired the Education Finance
Budget Subcommittee. He had more to do with how and how much
our schools spent than any other single individual for eight
years prior to becoming Superintendent. He was an important member
of the Assembly’s governing leadership in the years before
he went to the Senate. He had the ability to take an active role
to turn our education system around. If any one person was positioned
to restore our education system to excellence, it would have
been him.
In fact, during his
time, education spending has gone up, and the quality of the
education system has gone down. So his recent
comments that the Governor is trying to undermine the “restoration” of
our school system’s excellence by “starving our schools” rings
hollow. He claims that we are not “investing in our future.” by
spending more money on schools.
First, his comments
are false. The Governor is spending more money on schools than
last year, just not as much as O’Connell
wants to spend. Second, if money were the problem, as I have
demonstrated before, California would have solved this crisis
long ago. The state has almost doubled per pupil spending in
the last ten years, and test scores have gone down, meanwhile,
salaries for the adults making money off the system have skyrocketed.
School superintendent salaries are approaching $200,000 per year,
and O’Connell whines that the schools don’t have
enough money. He advocates raising your taxes and spending more
money on our current failing system. He also wants to make the
system bigger by including pre-school in the current system.
That’s real smart—we should give the system more
of our money and more of our kids so they can mess things up
even more.
Perhaps if O’Connell would have held school bureaucrats
accountable for their failures in the Legislature, or even in
his current position, the state’s system would not be in
the mess it is in now. But rather than demanding more from the
adults and unions who are making lots of money off the system,
O’Connell has chosen to become their apologist and chief
cheerleader. Like Captain Smith, O’Connell would drive
the ship into greater danger following the common wisdom rather
than thinking outside the box. Maybe he should just do his job,
and let the Governor fix the system. Our kids would be better
off if he did. To twist a cliché a little bit, continuing
to spend money upgrading the deck chairs on the Titanic is missing
the point. CRO
§
|
|