|
|
Contributor
Ray
Haynes
Mr.
Haynes is an Assembly member representing Riverside and
Temecula.
He serves on the Appropriations and Budget Committees. [go to
Assembly Member Haynes
website at California Assembly][go to Haynes index]
An
Agenda For Liberty
Individual liberty should guide the Governor's vision...
[Ray Haynes] 1/13/04
Last Tuesday, Governor Schwarzenegger laid out his agenda for
California in his state of the state address. Like so many of
the newspaper reporters, I want to recommend an agenda for him
to follow: an agenda that promotes individual liberty.
Why liberty? It’s simple. There are two ways we make
decisions in our life—either we make them ourselves or
someone makes them for us. Sometimes, we allow someone else to
make a decision for us, like when we allow our employers to tell
us when we have to show up for work, or when we hand over how
we spend our money to our spouse. We usually voluntarily hand
over decisions in exchange for something else (like money, or
other benefits). Other decisions are made for us whether we like
it or not, like how much in taxes we have to pay. Government
usually makes those decisions. We don’t get anything for
giving up that kind of decision-making power. In fact, it usually
costs us, because if government makes the decision for us, they
usually hire a very expensive bureaucrat (and raise our taxes)
to make that decision.
An agenda that promotes individual liberty increases the number
of voluntary decisions we get to make, and decreases the number
of decisions that government forces us to accept. It also makes
government smaller, cheaper, more efficient, and more effective.
More important, liberty unleashes the creative energy of those
who enjoy its benefit.
Here is an agenda for liberty:
(1)
Government should promote free enterprise in California—There
are two aspects to protecting and promoting free enterprise—freedom
of contract and protection of private property rights.
(a)
Government should promote Freedom of contract—California
interferes with more private contracts that any other government
in the nation. We do it for the best of reasons, we want to protect
people, but the regulations, the laws, the rules, and the court
decisions that limit choices limit how we feed our families (by
preventing us from making our own deals with our employers),
how we spend the money we earn (by limiting what we can buy with
that money), and sometimes tells us how much we have to pay for
something. Freedom of contract allows us to make our own decisions
about what we do for a living, what we buy, and how we live.
(b)
Government should protect private property rights—Private
property is how we keep what we earn, either through savings,
real estate, or other investments. If government can take it
away, we have little or no incentive to earn it.
(2)
Government should protect and promote Private Institutions—We
choose many ways to order our lives. We raise and educate our
children in families, we go to private social clubs, we use churches
and local charities to take care for the poor and disabled. More
things get done by people working on their own, with their families,
and with their neighbors, through private institutions, than
whatever occurs in the hours between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., when
the government offices are open
The Legislative ideas that would implement this agenda for individual
liberty are (1) cutting government regulation on business; (2)
getting government out of land-use planning and regulations;
(3) parental choice in education and child rearing; (4) free
market based health care reforms; and (5) Faith based and community
based social welfare programs. A free people may succeed or fail,
but at least success or failure is the result of their own decisions
and not the decision of some bureaucrat or politician.
Governor
Schwarzenegger, if you truly want real radical ides to unleash
the creative energies of Californians, read Thomas
Jefferson and follow his blueprint. Liberty has worked everywhere
it has been tried. It may actually work even here in California.
§
|
|