No wonder
that while Islamic terrorism claims lives by the thousands
every year, Hollywood churns out movies about the menace
of Joe McCarthy, the
Crusaders, Israeli Mossad and Richard Nixon. Freud called it displacement.
Let's be honest: people fixate on the environment when they can't deal with
real threats. Combating the climate gives the non-hawks a chance to look
tough. They figure, "Let's flex our muscle with this Mother Nature thing.
Let's take a preemptive strike at an SUV. Let's show 'em we can be tough
too." So they play up climate change like it's as urgent as terrorism,
which they claim is overstated.
Before "An Inconvenient Truth" came along, we were treated to "The Day After
Tomorrow," which foretold of an imminent warming disaster and was being used
to promote signing of the Kyoto Treaty. Forget the Patriot Act — who needs
it — it's Kyoto that'll save you. These people worry about junk science
that may or may not kill them in a thousand years instead of the people who
really are trying to kill them the day after tomorrow.
In fact, the more menacing terrorism becomes, the more they worry about the
weather. Scared out of their wits and at a loss for how to fight terrorists — which
requires testicles — they confront "climate change," which doesn't
actually require doing anything aside from spending other
people's money like a bitch. Yes, let's spend trillions of dollars on something
that may not be real, may not need fixing, or may not be possible to fix.
No wonder some of these people chain themselves to trees — they think
money grows on them. (One plausible theory posits that this whole global
warming scare is just another scheme to bankrupt the
American economy, so that the socialists can turn around and say, "See?
We told you capitalism doesn't work!")
Meanwhile, a real solution to a real problem — say, missile defense — is
regarded as a joke by these types. So while the hawks among us worry about
preventing the Armageddon that's coming, our modern-day hippies just want to
make sure the planet is in pristine condition when it does.
Why are these people so worried about the environment, anyway? It's not like
they're living on this planet. Speaking of which, scientists have recently
discovered global warming on Mars. See that? Martians need to stop driving
those damned SUVs!
Interestingly, even Gore can't resist an apocalyptic tone when preaching the
gospel of doom: "The Book of Revelation [says] God will destroy those who
destroy his creation." He notes that "Noah was commanded to preserve biodiversity," and
asks audiences to believe that we have less than 10 years before
we "cross a point of no return."
He also says we "have to think differently about war" — a reference to
war's environmental consequences (and a handy excuse to not fight the enemy).
Mind you, this comes from a man who has compared the U.S. military to a totalitarian
regime. Yeah, I'd prefer to talk about the weather now too.
For some reason, Democrats are commonly thought to be better for the environment
than Republicans. But it's liberals who are polluting our
water supply with all their anti-depressant medications. That's not Republican
Prozac in the water (Republicans can function in reality; they don't need
to create an alternate universe for themselves like Hollywood or academia).
Perhaps if Democrats were less liberal, they wouldn't need so much medication?
They might even be able to face their enemies.
"We have a short time in the life of the planet to turn this around," Bill Clinton
told a July audience at the Aspen Ideas Festival, adding that if Democrats hoped
to win in November, they should focus on climate change — which he called
a much more important issue than he thought when he was in office. Note that
this grave warning comes from a man who declined to
bring bin Laden to justice when Sudan offered him on a silver platter and instead allied us
with bin Laden in Kosovo and Bosnia;
from a man who didn't
respond to the 1993 World Trade Center attack or any of the other attacks
against us on his watch; and from a man who quashed the FBI investigation of
the Oklahoma City bombing despite evidence pointing
to a Middle Eastern connection.
Sure enough, Clinton says Democrats should stress the national security angle
of clean energy, according to the Vail Daily newspaper.
Memo to the Left: That heat you're feeling isn't global warming. It's global
Islam. It's real, and it's getting closer.
But having found a warm and fuzzy cause to snuggle up against in this big,
bad, scary world, the enviros pick a fight with the one guy they're not
scared of: America. Notice that the undercurrent in all the doomsday rhetoric
is America as chief culprit in the axis of enviro-evil (just as it is in
all the world's turmoil). Some even want to hold the U.S. legally liable
for rising sea levels in other countries because of our carbon dioxide
emissions — even though an awful lot of people from those countries
move here to do their emitting. (Can we be legally liable if half of them
come here illegally?)
Whether human-impacted global warming is real or not, we shouldn't worry about
the distant future. Using an enviro-doomsday computerized weather model,
I calculated that our catastrophe-to-be should befall us soon after the
caliphate has completed its takeover. Just in time to put the planet out
of its misery.
CRO
This piece first appeared at JewishWorldReview.com
The America Show
