What
Mel Gibson gave voice to in his not-so-drunken eruption
last week
wasn't very different from what a sizeable chunk
of the country has been saying about recent wars. The only
difference is that Mel slipped and actually used the word "Jews" instead
of code words like neocons, Zionists or the Jewish/Israeli
lobby. (Recall the Harvard report which said essentially
that the U.S. is being led around by the nose by the Israeli
lobby and friends of Israel against our own national interests.)
So the "truth serum" that everyone is talking about
exposed a lot of people, who were then — as you might
imagine — all too eager to slam Gibson, as a way of
distinguishing their anti-Semitism from his. This includes
Jews who also rail against "the neocons."
Most anti-Semites are not consciously such. That's how it
became possible to wipe out one-third of the Jewish population
worldwide. It's not just the small number of out-and-proud
anti-Semites who make such a feat possible.
(Of course, this number isn't so small today amid 1.5 billion
Muslims who almost uniformly dislike Jews, to say the least.)
But it takes the duping, and then the complicity, of those
who can't recognize the driving force behind the perceptions
being peddled, and who don't know that they are themselves
open to discriminating against what they perceive to be a
powerful, privileged, successful and wealthy group.
While forgiveness
is right and fair and natural, the eagerness to forgive
Gibson — as was on display from at least
two late-night TV audiences the very week that the incident
surfaced — may have as much to do with people being
annoyed by Jews as with their sympathy for Mel. Of all the
minorities, for some reason Jews tend to have the shortest
window of grievance opportunity before sentiment turns against
them for taking offense (frequently called whining), eyes
start rolling and the Jews start apologizing for complaining
("Sorry, uh-no, there's nothing wrong with blaming Jews.
Why, some of my best friends are anti-Semites!")
To illustrate,
let's imagine an equivalent scenario, in which Gibson goes
on an anti-black tirade in his drunkenness,
yelling something to the effect of "The blacks are ruining
this country!" Would black people come out to defend
him, saying that he's just an alcoholic and his words in
no way reflect the way he really feels about black people?
Add to the mix a father who has said that the problem of
slavery was overblown, and the son telling everyone to back
off his dad, who "taught me everything I know." What
black person would come to this man's defense? What white
person would?
Gibson himself
has been more forthcoming than those who are defending
him, writing in his statement that he wants
to work with the Jewish community to find out "where
these feelings are coming from." That's not exactly
blaming the alcohol, as others have been doing for him — and
as we know, the first step is admitting you have a problem.
For that, he may be the most honest man in America.
As they work together
to get to the bottom of Gibson's anti-Jewish sentiments,
one place that he and the Jewish community should
look is the new church he's building near his Malibu home.
As People Magazine reports, The Holy Family church "will
house a so-called 'traditionalist' Catholic congregation,
where Mass is said in Latin and parishioners subscribe to
pre-Vatican II beliefs." As we know, one of the most
significant points of departure of Vatican II was the lifting
of culpability from Jews for Christ's death and warning against
passion plays. One certainly wonders why some Catholics are
more fixated on whether Jews killed a Jew two thousand years
ago than on the countless Muslims killing Christians today.
In a way, Gibson's arrest and the non-event that the public
wants it to hurry up and become are a metaphor for the world's
relapse into anti-Semitism, which is frequently called by
other names.
In the early history
of anti-Semitism, Jews were persecuted for their religion.
Next, it was Jewish blood that was the
problem. Today the virus has mutated into targeting "Israeli
policies," "Zionism" or the "disproportionate
influence" of the Jews. The incident with the decent
Mel Gibson belies the disconnect that the "non-anti-Semites" indulge
in between these "valid criticisms" and anti-Semitism.
Perhaps we're all just reluctant to admit that we're looking
down the dark barrel of what we've only read about in the
history books. CRO
This piece first appeared at JewishWorldReview.com