national opinion

Monday Column
Carol Platt Liebau

[go to Liebau index]

Latest Column:
Stopping the Meltdown
What Beltway Republicans Need To Do

Subscribe to CRO Alerts
Sign up for a weekly notice of CRO content updates.

Jon Fleischman’s
The premier source for
California political news

Michael Ramirez

editorial cartoon

Do your part to do right by our troops.
They did the right thing for you.
Donate Today

CRO Talk Radio
Contributor Sites
Laura Ingraham

Hugh Hewitt
Eric Hogue
Sharon Hughes
Frank Pastore
[Radio Home]

















Chris Field- Contributor

Chris Field is Editor of Human Events Online [go to Field index]

Kill Bill vs. Kill Jesus
Selective criticism...
[Chris Field] 4/19/04

Last week, I read an interesting movie review on the Fox News website. The review by Roger Friedman was on the new movie by Quentin Tarantino, Kill Bill, Vol. 2, and contained nothing but praise for the flick. (For those of you unfamiliar with the Kill Bill movies, they are samurai-style films known for their violence and blood as much as their quality.)

But strangely enough (well, maybe not that strangely), reading Friedman's old stuff we find that his main complaint with Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ was its graphic violence and blood. So, after reading of his love for Tarantino and Kill Bill, Vol. 2, I sent to Friedman an email. I thought y'all might enjoy it.

Mr. Friedman,


I noted with interest your review of Kill Bill, Vol. 2. What made the review of this movie interesting -- and your replay of praise for Vol. 1 - was not the actual good things you had to say about it, but, rather, reading it in light of what you wrote about The Passion of the Christ.

Here's what you penned on February 25, 2004:


"But the real problem with 'The Passion' is that it is graphic beyond belief, and unrelenting. How anyone will be able to sit through this thing is the real mystery. There is blood, blood, everywhere. The violence toward Jesus is sadistic and grotesque."

If the "real problem" with The Passion was the violence, would not that same characterization and "problem" hold true for at least Kill Bill, Vol. 1, if not also Kill Bill, Vol. 2 (which I've yet to see)?


Or, were you hoping no one would remember your "excuse" for not liking The Passion - which was your supposed dislike for "graphic" and "unrelenting" violence.


In light of your comments about The Passion, I also found it ironic (maybe just plain weird) that you closed your column on Kill Bill, Vol. 2 with the words "Have a happy Easter."


Regards (and Happy Easter),

Chris Field


Since then, I've dug up Mr. Friedman's review of Kill Bill, Vol. 1. You might find it as interesting as I did, that this movie critic who was so worried about the violence of The Passion had this to say about Tarantino's first Kill Bill installment:

"...these were the impressions I was left with after the screening: that it rocked, that the violence and spurting blood was cartoon-like fun..."

I'm just guessing, but I'm not sure Mr. Friedman's problem with The Passion was actually the violence. CRO

copyright 2004 Human Events




Blue Collar -  120x90
120x90 Jan 06 Brand
Free Trial Static 02
ActionGear 120*60
Free Trial Static 01
Applicable copyrights indicated. All other material copyright 2003-2005