A
Republican Path to Victory in '06
The CA Dem Leaders Hand Republicans All They Need...
[Thomas G. Del Beccaro] 2/15/06
Sometimes,
but not always, elections are about definable choices.
Reagan v.
Mondale - a clear choice between a conservative and liberal.
Bush I v. Clinton - not so clear - Bush had to defend his tax
hikes. Clinton campaigned on tax cuts and openly stated that
the tax and spend policies of his party were not the answer.
Contributor
Thomas G. Del Beccaro
Thomas
G. Del Beccaro is publisher of the website Political
Vanguard. [go to Del Beccaro index] |
Often Republicans
do well when there are definable choices: Reagan over Carter
and then Mondale, Bush II over Gore and Kerry, and not so well
when the choices are ill-defined: Clinton over Bush I and Dole
(Dole was a big tax increaser), Carter over Ford.
California’s
2006 election could shape up to be a clear choice between Republicans
and Democrats – courtesy of the Democrat leaders. The
only question is whether the Republicans will capitalize on
an election – an election which can be on issues
over which Republicans hold the majority view – even
in California, i.e., on lower taxes, crime prevention, property
rights and sane budgets.
On the Dem
side, we have the presumptive favorite for the Dems gubernatorial
nominee Phil Angelides. He is nothing if not an old time, union
owned, tax and spend liberal. Recently, Angelides picked up
the endorsement of California Teachers Association.
When he did so, he promised to boost spending even higher than the 2005 11%
increase and the similar increase expected this year. How does he propose to
pay for it? You guessed it: by raising taxes on the so-called “richest” Californians
along with tax hikes on corporations. Tax and spend. Pure and Simple.
In addition
to Angelides, there is Dem Senate Leader Don Perata. When he
is not looking over his shoulder at FBI investigators he is
reaching into your pocket looking to spend your money. His
response to the spending increases proposed by Arnold, including
the bonds? Not good enough. He wants to spend more.
If that is
not enough for you, don’t forget that we have the Reiner
initiative which seeks to raise taxes on the “richest” Californians
to pay for a new government program.
Given the
Dems open and tired playbook, the Republican strategy for winning
in 2006 should be simple and clear: present a contrast and
run on Republican issues shared by a majority of Californians.
In other words, Republicans do not need to be like Dems to
win. They can win by running on issues on which Californians
agree with Republicans – and there are plenty of those
issues.
In fact,
Republicans should mount a unified statewide campaign whereby
every candidate adopts a pledge to support:
- No more
taxes,
- Property
rights reform,
- Tougher
crime laws including Jessica’s Law, and
- ·Limited
budgets.
By presenting
a united front on those issues, all of which have majority
support in California:
- Republicans
will be taking the fight to the Democrats instead of playing
defense, and
- Republicans
will be presenting a clear choice in this election.
Both are necessary. Both can be accomplished. Both can be a path to victory. CRO
copyright
2006 Thomas G. Del Beccaro
§
|