|
|

Latest Column:
Stopping
the Meltdown
What Beltway Republicans Need To Do
..........

CaliforniaRepublic.org
opinon in
Reagan country
..........

..........

Jon
Fleischman’s
FlashReport
The premier source for
California political news
..........

Michael
Ramirez
editorial cartoon
@Investor's
Business
Daily
..........
Do
your part to do right by our troops.
They did the right thing for you.
Donate Today

..........
..........

..........

tOR Talk Radio
Contributor Sites
Laura
Ingraham
Hugh
Hewitt
Eric
Hogue
Sharon
Hughes
Frank
Pastore
[Radio Home]
..........
|
|
Contributors
Gordon
Cucullu- Contributor
Former Green
Beret lieutenant colonel, Gordon Cucullu is now an editorialist,
author and a popular speaker. Born into a military
family, he lived and served for more than thirteen years in East
Asia, including eight years in Korea. For his Special Forces
service in Vietnam he was awarded a Bronze Star, Vietnamese Cross
of Gallantry, and the Presidential Unit Commendation. After separation
from the Army, he worked on Korea and East Asian affairs at both
the Pentagon and Department of State as well as an executive
for General Electric in Korea. His first major non-fiction work,
Separated
at Birth: How North Korea became the Evil Twin, is
based in large part on his extensive experience in
Korea and East Asia as a governmental insider and businessman.
[website]
[go to Cucullu index]
Atomic
Procreation
Immigrating into the club…
[Gordon Cucullu] 3/3/05
We’re
all aware of the scramble some countries are making to go nuclear.
North
Korea and Iran are foremost. Others, like
Pakistan and India already achieved the goal. A few of the former
republics of the doornail-deal Soviet Union also inherited atomic
weapons. We are also worried that terrorist groups like al Qaeda,
Hezbollah, and others yearn for a bomb to explode in Israeli
or American cities. But there is another way that the radical
Islamists may come into atomic weapons, albeit long-term: they
may simply procreate their way into power and take over a nuclear
weapons country.
On the face that sounds
absolutely preposterous. Who would allow such a ridiculous
scenario to develop? One candidate is France.
Bear with me while we look at how this came about. If there is
any consistency to France it is that as a country it can be fickle,
ungrateful, and totally self-serving. As Tallyrand is reported
to have said, ‘France does not have friends; France has
interests.’ Fair enough. In the post-WWII days, one famous
Frenchman, General Charles de Gaulle made himself sufficiently
acerbic and opportunistic that it was considered necessary by
the US and Great Britain to humor him. As a consequence France
got a piece of the divided Germany, a veto-wielding seat at the
new United Nations, and a key role in NATO.
It was considered
necessary at the time to award France these concessions despite
the fact that it had been a Vichy collaborator
with minor contributions if any toward ultimate Allied victory,
because the internal communist movement had grown so strong within
France that its post-war government teetered on collapse. There
were those who worried with cause that a communist takeover might
presage a strategic alliance between a newly communized France
and the highly aggressive post-WWII Soviet Union. While the Soviets
were gobbling countries like M&Ms in Eastern Europe and fermenting
uprisings in Greece, Iran, and Italy, it was all the Allies could
do to confront them there. Having France flip into the Soviet
sphere would have exposed America, Great Britain, and their allies
to a strategic flanking movement that probably would have made
Central Europe indefensible.
So France was treated
like one of the big kids on the block despite wartime perfidy,
minor contributions, and what in today’s
vernacular would be called major attitude. In ensuing years France,
under de Gaulle and his successors, established a firm reputation
as a thorn in NATO’s side. At one point de Gaulle decided
to go it alone. He announced formation of his ‘force de
frappe’ that signaled France’s independence from
the American defense umbrella, and announced that France would
have its own nuclear capability. Testing was conducted in its
South Pacific Island colonies. Additionally, France tossed out
American forces. President Lyndon B. Johnson famously instructed
his representative to ask de Gaulle personally, ‘when you
say you want all American soldiers out of France, General, does
that include the ones who are buried here too?’ De Gaulle
snorted, spun on his heel and walked away. Score one for LBJ.
The ultimate result
is that France remains a nuclear power. In the ensuing decades
that has not been a particular issue.
France is a democracy, albeit an eccentric one, and has not threatened
its neighbors with atomic weapons unlike Kim Jong Il or the mullahs
in Teheran. But France has exposed an internal flank to a persistent
enemy, and may not even be savvy enough – or sufficiently
introspective – to perceive the danger. For the past twenty
years France has permitted virtually unlimited immigration of
Muslims. Most have come from Algeria, a former French colony.
Others have come from different parts of the Muslim world. They
came as workers for the agricultural, industrial, and manufacturing
sectors of the French economy. They filled many service jobs:
taxi drivers, clerks, waiters, food preparation, janitors, and
other manual, menial laborer tasks. Few professionals were among
these immigrants.
The immigrants chose
intentionally not to assimilate into French culture. Rather
than try to ‘become Frenchmen’ the
Muslim immigrants established enclaves – literally states
within the state – that were exclusionary to non- Muslims
and held to the old ways. An ingenious system of arranged marriages
acted as a catalyst to increase immigration dramatically. Brides
and grooms would be selected from families that remained in Algeria
or other Arab countries. After the marriage, the entire extended
family of the newly married person would now be eligible to move
into metropolitan France and become citizens. Further exacerbating
the issue, France has an asylum policy that encourages dissidents
to flee to France. Few are actually granted asylum but none are
ever deported.
Into this fertile,
disaffected immigrant soil came Saudi Arabia with its proselytizing,
aggressive wahabbist ideology. Wahabbism
is vitriolic, anti- Western, xenophobic and jihad-oriented. It
encourages hatred of and actions against those defined as ‘infidels’ and ‘nonbelievers.’ The
Saudis continue to pour uncounted hundreds of millions of dollars
into Europe, including France, to promulgate this offensive ideology.
The result is that Muslims in France are highly radicalized,
anti-French, anti-Western, and bent on ultimate conquest of their
hosts. Texts from mosques in France – issued by the Saudi
public affairs office – refer to Muslim residents in France
as ‘living behind enemy lines’ and ‘representing
a force for the ultimate conquest by Islam of the infidels.’ Muslims
are taught to hate their Christian, Jewish, and secular neighbors
and to work assiduously to undermine the government. More than
one thousand of these Muslim enclaves exist in France. It is
said that French police will not enter 400 of them.
While demographers bemoan the rapid, perhaps irreversible, decline
in ethnic French population, the Muslim immigrant population
is exploding. Within just a few years it is conceivable that
the Muslim immigrant community may be able to establish itself
as a key if not controlling bloc in the French government. They
may not have sufficient power to be kings but they can certainly
be king-makers. At what point will the scales tip sufficiently
into their hands that the French constitution could be re-written
to mimic that of a theocratic state? At what point will Islamist
interests be strong enough to control the military forces, including
the nuclear weapons? These are not idle questions because time
is roaring like a freight train and the demographics may be out
of control. And the French public seems totally unconcerned about
the situation. That makes it even more frightening.
Sixty years ago we
were concerned that US strategic interests would be compromised
by a France that fell to communism. Today
France is again a concern. All it would require is a ‘one
man, one vote, one time,’ scenario to flip France into
the Islamist camp along with its nuclear weapons capability.
That is a strategic issue that no one wishes to see come about;
but frighteningly no one seems willing to acknowledge. tRO
Curious
about North Korea? Learn more in Gordon’s
best-selling book Separated
at Birth: How North Korea became the Evil Twin became
the Evil Twin, Lyons Press available at bookstores now.
copyright
Gordon Cucullu 2005
§
|
|
|