Sign Up for
Google Alerts!

theOneRepublic
content headlines
sent out every day
email us to sign up

 


 

 

 


Latest Column:
Stopping the Meltdown
What Beltway Republicans Need To Do

..........


CaliforniaRepublic.org
opinon in
Reagan country

..........


..........


Jon Fleischman’s
FlashReport
The premier source for
California political news

..........


Michael Ramirez
editorial cartoon
@Investor's
Business
Daily

..........

Do your part to do right by our troops.
They did the right thing for you.
Donate Today

..........

..........

..........


tOR Talk Radio
Contributor Sites
Laura Ingraham

Hugh Hewitt
Eric Hogue
Sharon Hughes
Frank Pastore
[Radio Home]

..........


 

 

Contributors
Gordon Cucullu- Contributor

Former Green Beret lieutenant colonel, Gordon Cucullu is now an editorialist, author and a popular speaker. Born into a military family, he lived and served for more than thirteen years in East Asia, including eight years in Korea. For his Special Forces service in Vietnam he was awarded a Bronze Star, Vietnamese Cross of Gallantry, and the Presidential Unit Commendation. After separation from the Army, he worked on Korea and East Asian affairs at both the Pentagon and Department of State as well as an executive for General Electric in Korea. His first major non-fiction work, Separated at Birth: How North Korea became the Evil Twin, is based in large part on his extensive experience in Korea and East Asia as a governmental insider and businessman. [website] [go to Cucullu index]


Separated at Birth : How North Korea Became the Evil Twin
Gordon Cucullu


Gordon Cucullu Recommends
Endgame: The Blueprint for Victory in the War on Terror
Thomas McInerney &
Paul E. Vallely


Gordon Cucullu Recommends
Beyond Baghdad
Ralph Peters


Gordon Cucullu Recommends
Dawn over Baghdad
Karl Zinsmeister

Corruption Junction
The UN is a failed institution
...
[Gordon Cucullu] 6/22/04

The United Nations may indeed be the answer, as some like John Kerry and Ted Kennedy insist it is. But only if the question is ‘what is the most morally corrupt international organization in the world?’ Without argument the UN has degenerated into what esteemed journalist Claudia Rosett refers to as an institution mired in corruption, secrecy, venality and total lack of accountability.

That degree of ethical collapse might still be repairable, but only if the UN admits its errors. To date there are no signs of institutional remorse. In fact, the organization flouts its criminal actions in the face of the world, then wraps itself in sanctimonious platitudes in order to retain power. Given such an attitude there are few options left to the US other than to demand complete, top down reform of the UN.

Demonstrating how disconnected the UN is from reality, Rosett notes that in a recent UN survey Secretary General Kofi Anan frets over ‘tone at the top,’ a reference to the ‘less positive’ opinion most UN staffers have of their senior leaders. The problem isn’t tone, she continues, but ‘accountability at the top’ (emphasis added). In detailed testimony provided to the US House Subcommittee on National Security, Emerging Threats and International Relations, Rosett elaborated at length the incredible web of corruption that defined and obscured the UN Oil for Food Program.

Oil for Food was in theory a program whereby Saddam Hussein’s Iraq, though under international UN embargo, could sell limited amounts of oil and in return use the funds generated to purchase needed commodities such as food, medical supplies and the like for its population. It was established and running by December 1996 and continued under UN supervision until US and Coalition forces toppled Saddam Hussein in 2003.

As part of the search to find WMD, links to terrorist organizations and other violations by the Saddam regime, extensive files were discovered that catalogued the Oil for Food Program from the Iraqi Baathist regime’s point of view. For them it was merely another exercise in payoffs, bribes, intimidation, blackmail and threat. Saddam used Oil for Food as a way to circumvent economic sanctions, bring in prodigious amounts of money and lavish that money on himself and his cronies.

Along the way Saddam made certain that the right UN and complicit government pockets were well lined. For example, Kojo Anan, the Secretary-General’s son was in on the take as were government officials from Russia, China and France (surprise!). The UN administrator of the Oil for Fraud program, Benon Savan, reported directly to Kofi Anan and no one else. Even at this late date accounting and secrecy at the UN is so guarded that it cannot even officially verify the actual amount of money that went into the program. Anan’s figures are $111 billion, but that could easily be understated.

Tragically but hardly surprisingly, little if any relief was afforded the Iraqi people as a result of Oil for Food. Infant mortality rates soared. People lived in squalor and disease without even basics such as potable water and sufficient electric power. Infrastructure decayed. Hospitals had no medicines and test equipment. Education spiraled downward. A potentially developed, sophisticated society was allowed to sink deeper and deeper into poverty, disease, terror and death while a corrupt dictator was propped up. Saddam Hussein was a tyrant who strutted in palaces of gold and jewels while his people starved. Make no mistake; the UN was an accomplice to gross fraud with all its consequences. UN officials responsible for the Oil for Food program have the blood of tens of thousands of Iraqis on their hands.

Who in the UN? According to most observers the degree, scope and depth of corruption in the Oil for Food program is so extensive and pervasive that it is difficult to grasp. Rosett says that ‘had the UN deliberately set out to design a program opened to manipulation by Saddam Hussein’s regime, it is hard to think how the UN could have improved upon the arrangement that was put in place.’ In other words, this was no accident: the UN from the onset envisioned the Oil for Food program as a get-rich-quick program.

Okay, you might think, so the UN skimmed a bit off the top. Is that such a big deal? Well, yes, actually it was. So big that this scam has been characterized as involving ‘staggering levels of corruption.’ The rake off alone was estimated at more than $10 billion in bribes, kickbacks and other payoffs to individuals and to governments. Anan’s Secretariat office alone collected more than $1.4 billion over the life of the program supposedly to monitor, audit and administer it, yet due to a UN policy of extreme secrecy there are no public records of the program.

It was not until Coalition forces cracked open the extraordinarily thorough files kept by Iraqi intelligence offices that the entire putrid deal was exposed to light. Names from the UN, France, Russia and China immediately were discovered. Again, the numbers were in the billions and billions of dollars. For economic basket cases like France and Russia, with a long history of corruption, Oil for Food must have been the golden goose in the desert.

Now the motivation for the intense lobbying to prevent US and coalition enforcement of UN resolutions becomes clearer. All those Ministerial-level trips to Baghdad to assure Saddam that they would never permit the US to topple him are explained. Forget about human rights or international law. None of these leaders lose sleep over them. This was strictly a show-me-the-money deal. And much of the world fell for it then and falls for it now. Shame on them and more shame on those who choose to ignore UN criminal activity.

The fraud represented in the Oil for Food program, encouraged and virtually administered by the UN, guaranteed that Saddam’s rape rooms, torture chambers and mass graves would stay open for business. It gave him funds to continue to procure missile technology from North Korea, pursue WMD research and development programs, and funnel money to his own thugs and terrorist groups like Ansar al-Islam, Islamic Jihad and suicide bombers. In short, the UN kept in power the very dictator they professed to condemn in the Security Council chambers.

It has been frequently noted that the worst evil happens when good people perceive evil and are complacent about it. Right now we are at that point. We have been exposed to a metastasizing decay in the UN for decades yet continue to wax rhapsodically about the glorious nature of the institution. The harsh truth is that any institution composed in majority by authoritarian, dictatorial governments – as the UN is – cannot be better than its parts. The UN, like its predecessor the League of Nations is an idealistic concept but a dysfunctional reality.

The leopard does not change its spots by changing its environment. Place it in a cathedral and it is still a predator. Neither do thugs and crooks from dictatorial nations reform simply by crossing over the threshold of the United Nations building. They are still dangerous characters who have no moral authority to lecture anyone.

The UN, far from promoting world peace and safeguarding human rights, has sunk to the level of accomplice if not perpetrator. Oil for Food is the tip of the iceberg, not the entirety. Virtually every so-called ‘peace keeping’ mission has turned sour because of ineptitude, cowardice and corruption. The UN record for human rights protection evaporated in such hell holes as Rwanda and the Balkans. The record of failure is long and shameful.

The solution is first to recognize that the UN is a failed institution. Instead of American politicians talking about subverting US sovereignty in defense, military and economic matters to this pit of corruption, they ought to be demanding accountability on behalf of our citizens and taxpayers. The most effective way to do convince people of UN failure is through investigation, disclosure and transparency. Once the shocking truth is revealed, the UN is unlikely to be able to continue to operate in its present form.

The time is long overdue to draw up an international organization whose membership is predicated on existence of a representative government. Bad apples like France would still be members but would not be able to dominate. An institution of democracies would have infinitely greater moral credibility and fortitude than the money and power hungry collection of reprobates that now inhabits the buildings on Turtle Bay. CRO

copyright Gordon Cucullu 2004

§

 

 

 
freedompass_120x90
Monk
Blue Collar -  120x90
120x90 Jan 06 Brand
Free Trial Static 02
2004_movies_120x90
ActionGear 120*60
VirusScan_120x60
Free Trial Static 01
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
Applicable copyrights indicated. All other material copyright 2003-2005 theOneRepublic.com