, 2008

over 2 million served




Visit our sister site
home to conservatives
in arts and entertainment

Somewhere between
Hollywood and Vine
lies ExileStreet

In Residence:
Julia Gorin
Burt Prelutsky
Steve Finefrock
Patrick Hurley
Ralph Peters
Bruce Thornton


Julia Gorin

by Julia Gorin


Wounded Warrior
Please Help Those
Who Protect Us

Burt Prelutsky

The Secret of Their

by Burt Prelutsky

Conservatives Are From Mars, Liberals Are From San Francisco
by Burt Prelutsky

America Alone
by Mark Steyn

The CRO Store



How Do We Respond to the Budget Crisis?
by Jon Coupal 4/23/08

It has been said that when the California Legislature departs in September for the year, taxpayers can finally loosen the hold on their wallets and use that hand to wipe their brows, thanking their lucky stars they made it through another tax and spend romp in Sacramento. 2008, however, may prove to be the year taxpayers grab onto their wallets with both hands and never let go.

The state, at minimum, faces a $16 billion deficit. The solutions being offered are coming from two schools of thought. The first says that taxes must be increased to cover any shortfall regardless of the impact on taxpayers or the economy. The second says that the difference between revenue and spending should be resolved by cuts in spending which has increased 36% over the past four years.

Jon Coupal

Jon Coupal is an attorney and president of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association -- California's largest taxpayer organization with offices in Los Angeles and Sacramento. [go to website] [go to Coupal index]

Of course, a majority of California legislators agree with the former approach, to the detriment of the taxpayers protections contained in Propositions 13 and Proposition 218, the Right to Vote on Taxes Act. These constitutional protections are now being threatened by legislators whose sole focus is to appease the spend-happy special interests that got them elected, not the already heavily taxed constituents they were elected to serve. The result is a government with little fiscal accountability and discipline.

So, it comes as no surprise that Sacramento has proposed at least six different proposals that would directly impact Propositions 13 and 218. If all were approved, it could mean tens of billions of new taxes.

What follows is a tax hike wall of shame that demonstrates to what lengths legislators will go to take more of your hard-earned money:

1. ACA 10 by Assemblyman Mike Feuer: Would lower the threshold for    local transportation infrastructure bonds from two-thirds to 55%,    much as Proposition 39 did for school facilities projects in    2000. Of course, this bond debt is not subject to Proposition    13's one percent cap, and would place significant new burdens on    property owners, many of whom are already struggling to keep up    with their mortgages. It should also be noted that HJTA has    opposed five of Mr. Feuer's bills this year, giving him the    dubious distinction of winning the 2008 "Taxpayer Despair" award    among his legislative peers.

2. SCA 17 by State Senator Joe Simitian: Would lower the two-thirds    vote threshold for school district parcel tax increases to 55%.    The same logic applies to SCA 17 as ACA 10. Proving that if at    first you don't succeed tax, tax again, Mr. Simitian has now    introduced this bill in consecutive legislative sessions.

3. SCA 21 by State Senator Christine Kehoe: Would lower the general    obligation bond threshold for "essential services buildings"    including for local emergency and public safety from two-thirds    to 55%.

4. SCA 22: Would eliminate the two-thirds constitutional requirement    to pass a budget, and would also prohibit a referendum on "any    bill scheduled to take effect immediately." SCA 22 willfully    ignores voters who widely rejected Proposition 56 to lower the    budget approval threshold to 55% in 2004.

5. SB 1430 & SCA 18, Senator Torlakson: SB 1430 creates a new    vehicle to tax people, an "education finance district" which    consists of school districts joining together to approve new    taxes. SB 1430 would provide the power for these districts to    levy special taxes, and SCA 18 would ensure that could be done    with a majority vote, in stark violation of Proposition 13 and    the California Constitution.

6. AB 2914, Charles Calderon: Would impose an 8 percent tax on the    viewing of adult entertainment. This bill puts tax-happy    legislators in the awkward position of rooting for X-rated    businesses in order to put more money in the General Fund coffers    and would be similar to the clean air and health groups who are    dependent on tobacco taxes having a vested interest in more    smoking. Mr. Calderon has now introduced this bill in consecutive    years.

7. SCA 13, Senator Torlakson: This bill would impose an additional    tax on cigarettes for health-related purposes, despite the fact    that voters rejected a similar proposal, Proposition 86, in the    2006 elections. We again stress that this budget will not be    balanced by raising taxes.

8. AB 2897, Loni Hancock: Would impose new income tax rates of 10 &    11 percent on those making $136,000 and $272,000 respectively.    According to the non-partisan Legislative Analyst's Office, over    half of the personal income tax dollars collected come from those    making over $200,000 a year, but they make up just three percent    of the total returns. It seems counter-intuitive to propose    policies that would encourage those already contributing the most    to leave our state.

9. AB 2372, Joe Coto: Would place a one percent tax increase on    those making over $1 million annually to fund higher education.    Clearly, this would again lead to a mass exodus of taxpayer    dollars from California.

Nineteenth century orator Wendell Phillips once said, "Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty." So too, HJTA is always watching, ready to advocate for a budget that will be balanced with spending cuts, not taxes. The above list demonstrates how your Legislature responds to a fiscal crisis of its own making. It will take tremendous pressure from every citizen to compel lawmakers to see reason and pass a budget that respects the fact that California taxpayers are already among the most generous in the nation. CRO

copyright 2008 Howard Jarvis Taxpayers association



American Express
Apple iTunes
Apple iTunes
Overstock.com, Inc.
Wal-Mart.com USA, LLC
Overstock.com, Inc.
Applicable copyrights indicated. All other material copyright 2003-2008 CaliforniaRepublic.org