, 2008

over 2 million served




Visit our sister site
home to conservatives
in arts and entertainment

Somewhere between
Hollywood and Vine
lies ExileStreet

In Residence:
Julia Gorin
Burt Prelutsky
Steve Finefrock
Patrick Hurley
Ralph Peters
Bruce Thornton


Julia Gorin

by Julia Gorin


Wounded Warrior
Please Help Those
Who Protect Us

Burt Prelutsky

The Secret of Their

by Burt Prelutsky

Conservatives Are From Mars, Liberals Are From San Francisco
by Burt Prelutsky

America Alone
by Mark Steyn

The CRO Store



Prop. 13 Has Something for Every Homeowner
by Jon Coupal 4/8/08

Most people are aware that Proposition 13 is a boon to property owners in a rising market. Before Proposition 13, when the prices of homes were going up, property owners cringed at the arrival of the annual tax bill after a house in the neighborhood sold for a record high price. This was because they knew their bill would reflect what the new neighbor was willing or able to pay. Now, because Proposition 13 limits annual assessment increases to two percent, property owners have the security of knowing what their taxes will be from year to year. This has been especially important in recent years that have seen annual double digit inflation in California property values

But what about a declining market? What happens to those who bought at the height of the market and now see their homes have decreased in value by 15 percent or more?

Jon Coupal

Jon Coupal is an attorney and president of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association -- California's largest taxpayer organization with offices in Los Angeles and Sacramento. [go to website] [go to Coupal index]

Currently, most of the attention seems to be on those borrowers and lenders who agreed to highly speculative loans -- often interest only -- when the market was strong. The debate goes on in Washington and Sacramento as to whether or not taxpayers should be bailing out those who made bad decisions, now that the housing boom has gone bust.

However, for those who bought recently, using sensible conventional mortgages, and who intend to remain in their homes, there may be some good news in the midst of the housing slump. Because of Proposition 13, these properties likely qualify for a tax reduction.

If you are one of those whose property's market value has declined to less than its taxable value on the assessor's books, you can apply for and likely receive a tax cut. This cut is temporary, but the savings are permanent.

In a number of counties, property owners may not even have to apply to receive a tax reduction. Many assessors are being proactive, automatically reevaluating those homes that were purchased from 2004 to 2007, at the height of the housing bubble

Recent homebuyers, who do not get a reduction notice and who believe their property has declined significantly in value, should contact the county assessor to request a reduction. Since property values nearly doubled between 2001 and 2006 those properties purchased before 2001 are unlikely to qualify for any reduction since any new lower value will still probably be much higher than the Assessor's valuation for tax purposes.

A good rule of thumb is, if you believe your home would sell today for less than the value reflected on your tax bill, you should apply for a reduction

However, homeowners who receive a tax cut would be wise to keep in mind that when the value of their property goes up again, so can their tax bills. Still, while property owners can be charged less, they can never be charged more in any one year than the maximum allowed under Proposition 13. This can be calculated by increasing the base value (usually the purchase price) by 2% compounded for each intervening year you have owned your home. (Using a compound interest calculator, available on the Internet, will simplify the work.) The maximum property tax liability in any one year is one percent of this total

Finally, the housing slump has prompted some opportunistic companies to contact recent home buyers and offer to file a tax reduction request with the assessor's office in return for a fee, usually a significant percentage of any savings that are realized. However, since the procedure of applying for a reduction is relatively simple and without cost, homeowners should consider doing it themselves. CRO

copyright 2008 Howard Jarvis Taxpayers association



American Express
Apple iTunes
Apple iTunes
Overstock.com, Inc.
Wal-Mart.com USA, LLC
Overstock.com, Inc.
Applicable copyrights indicated. All other material copyright 2003-2008 CaliforniaRepublic.org