..........
Visit our sister site
ExileStreet
home to conservatives
in arts and entertainment

Somewhere between
Hollywood and Vine
lies ExileStreet
In Residence:
Julia Gorin
Burt Prelutsky
Steve Finefrock
Patrick Hurley
Ralph Peters
Bruce Thornton
..........

Julia Gorin

Clintonisms
by Julia Gorin
..........

Wounded Warrior
Please Help Those
Who Protect Us

Burt Prelutsky

The Secret of Their
Success
by Burt Prelutsky

Conservatives Are From Mars, Liberals Are From San Francisco
by Burt Prelutsky
.........

America Alone
by Mark Steyn
..........

The CRO Store
..........

..........

Sacramento

Taxpayers Are Being Set Up by Jon Coupal 1/17/08

As taxpayers are bombarded daily with bad budget news, they are fastening their seat belts. It's going to be a bumpy ride.

Sacramento admits to a $14 billion deficit over the next 18 months and even this may turn out to be a conservative estimate. And right on cue, the tax and spend lobby has increased the pitch of its whining for higher taxes.

But there is an additional element to this budget talk that is deeply disturbing. Some are suggesting that the very leaders upon whom we rely not to raise taxes may be setting us up for a hard fall. Let's look at some of the evidence.

In his State of the State address the Governor ostensibly staked out a conservative position: No tax increases and across the board 10 percent spending cuts for all departments. Of course, his no tax increase position is belied by his calling for a variety of higher "fees" that are clearly taxes -- chief among which is a brand new tax on our property insurance bills.

But despite the relatively small tax increases ("only" $125 million in new revenue for the insurance tax), the primary tool the governor states he will use to balance the budget will be the spending cuts.

The problem with this plan is that, surprisingly, no distinction will be made between good cuts and bad cuts. Good programs, bad programs, stupid programs -- all will suffer the same fate. This is the equivalent of taking out a cancerous tumor with a hand grenade.

For conservatives, it is stunningly irresponsible to propose releasing over 20,000 felons because of the budget crisis. Public safety is government's first responsibility.

It has been suggested by more than one political insider that the Governor's entire approach is to set up Californians for a major tax increase. By including popular and needed government programs on the chopping block, is the Governor trying to deflect the wrath of the citizenry to conservative Republicans?

If that is true, fiscally responsible policy leaders ought to counter with an aggressive counterstrategy. For every popular spending program that the tax and spend lobby claims will be cut with tax increases, conservatives must point to specific examples of waste, fraud and abuse that should be addressed before we should be talking about further burdens on taxpayers.

And we need to respectfully suggest to the Governor that he dust off his "blowing up the boxes" speech. Indeed, in his first year in office, Schwarzenegger launched a long needed top to bottom review of state government called the California Performance Review. This project was one of the truly "fantastic" things Arnold pursued once elected. Unfortunately, it was inexplicably dropped just as it was gaining traction.

The whole strategy of threatening popular programs with major cuts -- as opposed to cutting wasteful spending -- is referred to as the Washington Monument Syndrome. We've talked about this phenomenon for years but it seems that the phrase is now on everyone's lips in Sacramento. That's a good thing because it acknowledges the level of gamesmanship being played here.

So when the tax and spend lobby proposes releasing 20,000 prisoners, taxpayers should demand that the billions in MediCal fraud be addressed first. Or, if we want to keep the issue within the corrections department, perhaps we should privatize our prisons to save money. Sure, the prison guards union (CCPOA) will pitch a hissy fit but, hey, what is more important -- keeping dangerous felons behind bars or placating a spoiled public employee union?

When the powerful education lobby demands that we not suspend Prop 98, perhaps we point out some of the absurd things our education tax dollars go to support. Why, for example, in the midst of a budget crisis, should we pay tuition for undocumented students? Or, better yet, the LAUSD -- dominated, of course, by the teachers unions -- just granted lifetime health benefits to retirees taking hundreds of millions of dollars out of the classroom. If we are that concerned about the kids, perhaps we should rethink those kinds of benefits which, by the way, very few other states have.

copyright 2008 Howard Jarvis Taxpayers association

§