Visit our sister site
home to conservatives
in arts and entertainment
Hollywood and Vine
by Julia Gorin
Who Protect Us
The Secret of Their
by Burt Prelutsky
Conservatives Are From Mars, Liberals Are From San Francisco
by Burt Prelutsky
by Mark Steyn
|Coalition Seeks to End Abusive Property Seizure
by Jon Coupal 11/28/07
Last week, a coalition led by the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association announced that more than one million signatures have been collected to qualify the California Property Owners and Farmland Protection Act (CPOFPA) for the June 2008 ballot. This eminent domain reform measure will stop government from taking homes, family farms, small business and places of worship and giving the land to other private interests.
The coalition, Californians for Property Rights Protection, has several notable organizations, all of which are vitally concerned with the rights of Californians to acquire, use and enjoy property.
Coupal is an attorney and president of the Howard
Jarvis Taxpayers Association -- California's largest
taxpayer organization with offices in Los Angeles
and Sacramento. [go to website] [go
to Coupal index]
"We are submitting this ballot measure to prevent government from snatching private property from unwilling sellers to benefit wealthy and politically connected developers," said former Senator Jim Nielsen, chairman of the California Alliance to Protect Private Property Rights. "California law needs to be changed to protect all California property owners from eminent domain abuse."
Since the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark Kelo v. New London case two years ago, California is not among the more than 40 states that have reformed their eminent domain laws -- and today, public agencies continue to seize private property from unwilling sellers for private projects that benefit wealthy and politically connected developers.
While the League of California Cities and other development interests that defend the policies that have resulted in the some most egregious cases of eminent domain abuse in the nation are trying to characterize the ballot measure as another Prop. 90, renowned property rights experts say otherwise.
According to independent analysis of the CPOFPA by the Institute for Justice (IJ), a non-profit organization that litigated the Kelo case, "California is one of the biggest abusers of eminent domain in the country." IJ added, "While CPOFPA would stop governments and redevelopment agencies from taking property for private uses, traditional uses of eminent domain for public use will not be affected."
The ballot measure does the following:
- Prohibits government from using eminent domain for private purposes, while allowing eminent domain to be used for legitimate public uses like building roads, schools, other government buildings and water projects.
- Provides procedural reforms and full compensation when property is seized for public purposes, including lifting the current $10,000 cap on reimbursable expenses associated with legal and other expenses for those property owners displaced by eminent domain.
- To protect the state's food supply and open space, prohibits public agencies from seizing family farms, ranches and other property in order to acquire water rights or acquire farmland land to further enable urban sprawl.
- Prohibits government from setting the price at which property owners sell or lease their property, but does not affect tenants currently living in rent-regulated communities. Because the CPOFPA is the only ballot measure on the June ballot that will provide protections for all property, it has gained considerable support from various small business owners since they are the most common victims of eminent domain abuse, and according to studies, minority-owned property in particular.
"Our members have worked hard to achieve their piece of the American Dream," said California Hispanic Chambers of Commerce Chairman Ken Macias. "Hispanic business owners deserve private property protections. This initiative is the only measure that will appear on the June ballot that protects our members from eminent domain abuse."
"California's economy and jobs are dependent on the success of small business owners," said National Federation of Independent Business California executive director John Kabateck. "California laws need to be changed to prohibit the kind of eminent domain abuse that allows government to profit by seizing homes and small businesses and giving it to politically connected developers."
"Eminent domain abuse is putting California family farms and ranches at risk," said Linden farmer Kenny Watkins, second vice president of the California Farm Bureau Federation. "We need this measure to protect against sprawl and assure that farmland stays in private ownership, so it can continue to provide the food and farm products that Californians need."
Simply stated, this ballot measure protects all California property owners. With the support of California voters, never again will government use eminent domain to destroy a person's home and livelihood.
The California Property Owners and Farmland Protection Act is sponsored by the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, the California Farm Bureau Federation and the California Alliance to Protect Private Property Rights. The ballot measure has been endorsed by NFIB, the Hispanic Chambers of Commerce, the Black Chamber of Commerce and a diverse coalition of taxpayer, faith-based groups and good government organizations. For more information regarding the CPOFPA measure, visit www.yesonpropertyrights.com. CRO
2007 Howard Jarvis Taxpayers association