Contributor
John
Campbell
John
Campbell (R-Irvine) is an Assemblyman representing the 70th
District
in Orange County. Mr. Campbell is the Vice-Chairman of the Assembly
Budget Committee. He is the only CPA in the California State
legislature
and recently received a national award as Freshman Republican
Legislator of the Year. He represents the cities of Newport
Beach,
Laguna Beach, Irvine, Costa Mesa, Tustin, Aliso Viejo, Laguna
Woods and Lake Forest. He can be reached through his Assembly
website
and through the website
for his California Senate campaign. [go to Campbell index]
Lots
of Change, Quickly
What a difference a year makes...
[John Campbell] 12/31/03
Sometimes days or hours seem to just creep by. Other times,
years appear to pass before you know it. I'm not sure whether
2003 went by slowly or quickly, but I am certain that a whole
lot happened in the areas of politics and public policy.
To illustrate
this point, do you realize that one year ago at this time,
the U.S. military was still mopping up from a successful
engagement in Afghanistan and pundits were speculating as to
if and when we might commence military operations in Iraq? The
national economy was in recession as the Fed was continuing to
lower interest rates, not quite sure of when or if the recession
might end. And, Gov. Davis had just been re-elected for a second
term and was preparing to issue a new budget proposal to balance
what he had just announced was a $30 billion state deficit. In
my district, the county of Orange was short one supervisor
and was still wrestling
with the recently passed Measure W which appeared to stop El
Toro airport, although the board never had an anti- airport majority.
So where are we now?
The U.S. military invaded and removed the dictatorship in Iraq
and now is working on winning the peace
and transferring power to a democratic Iraqi government. The
U.S. economy just finished the biggest one-quarter economic expansion
and productivity increase in over 40 years as talk begins that
the Fed may again start to raise interest rates to keep the economy
from "overheating." The recall of Gray Davis was begun
and finished with the election of Gov. Schwarzenegger, who will
be proposing a solution to deal with the $27 billion deficit
handed to him by the former governor. And the Orange County Board
of Supervisors now has an anti-airport majority that appears
to have buried that issue once and for all.
Wow. A lot that has turned 180 degrees in one year. And with
those kinds of swings, you can imagine that some people and groups
have been on the good side while others have been on the bad
side of all that change.
Now, I am
a person who appreciates the nuances of fine wines. In the
wine world, some years will be good in one wine growing
region of the world, and not so good in another. So, how did
2003 rate as a good year or bad year in some political circles?
Here is my assessment of a select few in the world of politics:
Good
Year
Arnold
Schwarzenegger: So you introduce your latest movie. It does well at the box
office. Then you run for governor of the
largest state in the union and win overwhelmingly while the whole
world pays attention. Every media outlet from C-SPAN to "Access
Hollywood" covers your every move. Then you deliver on a
couple of your promises to lower the car tax and repeal a bad
driver's license bill right away. Can it get any better than
this? But you still have to deal with that deficit leftover from
your predecessor. That will make 2004 more difficult.
George
Bush: Democrats
had planned to run against you in 2004 the same way they ran
against your father. They would grudgingly
admit that you've done OK in foreign policy, but it's the economy,
stupid. Well, your tax cut is spurring a strong economic recovery
that is surprising almost everyone. You also get a prescription
drug plan through Congress. The Democrats now find themselves
running against you without an issue. And their leading candidate
is Howard Dean, who has been given the nickname of "maple-flavored
McGovern," reflecting his extremism. Things aren't perfect
for George Bush, but they are going pretty darn well.
Democracy: Much of the misery placed upon the state by the one-party-ruling
Democrats in Sacramento was done in the dark of night in hopes
that the people would not notice. But they did notice. They felt
it in their lives and in their pocketbooks. And they know who
did it to them. We are all better off with a government whose
actions are transparent to and seen by the public. The recall,
for better or worse, was evidence of that. And it was evidence
that democracy is still very much alive in California.
Average Year
Phil
Angeledes: The state treasurer has made himself the front-runner
for the Democratic nomination for governor in 2006 with the implosion
of Cruz Bustamante in the recall. He is getting lots of ink as
the main Democratic foil of Arnold. But, in his quest to be against
everything the governor is for, he has reversed his own positions
on some things and has been seen by many as being overtly transparent
in his political grandstanding. So you are the front-running
Democrat, but you will probably have to run against Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Unions
and Trial Lawyers: The unions and trial lawyers had another great year through
September. Despite a budget crisis, Gov, Davis
gave public employee unions (his major contributors) substantial
increases in salaries and benefits and refused to reduce their
work force, preferring instead to raise taxes on the rest of
us. And trial lawyers were given many more opportunities to do
frivolous lawsuits. But Gov. Arnold is already putting together
a tort reform package designed to reduce junk lawsuit opportunities
and he campaigned against the "special interest" public
employee unions. So, now they are on the defensive and may lose
the gains they made last year. By the way, their loss will be
a gain for the economy and for everyone in the private sector
in this state.
Bad Year
Gray
Davis: Being only the second governor in the history of
any state to be recalled is not a legacy. It's hard to imagine
having a worse year in politics. To his credit, from election
night on, he handled his defeat and transition with dignity.
Indian
Gambling Tribes: A few years ago, most voters saw the
Indian tribes as impoverished peoples who had been wronged in
the past and who were putting up casinos in the middle of nowhere
merely to earn some money to provide running water to their tribal
members. The public now overwhelmingly sees them as a very rich
special interest that pumps millions into political campaigns
in order to maintain their government-sanctioned monopoly that
allows them to earn unconscionable profits while paying no taxes
and not having to comply with any state regulations. They had
a great deal going with the public but they got too greedy and
they blew it. It is the public relations disaster of the decade.
-:-
Will 2004 contain the same level of political change as 2003?
It's unlikely, although this will be an election year. But, at
the very least, the political earthquakes of 2003 will make 2004
another very interesting year.
This piece
first appeared in OC Metro
§
|