Ahmadinejad
was skillful. When he was asked about Hezbollah's use of
Iranian missiles against Israel, he ducked the question
and turned it around, bringing up the fact that Israel
was attacking Hezbollah with American bombs.
Wallace
stayed tough, asking, "Who supports Hezbollah? Who has
given hundreds of millions of dollars for years? Who has
given Hezbollah Iranian-made missiles and rockets that
is making…"
Predictably,
Ahmadinejad played rope-a-dope on this one, laughing and
appearing superficially reasonable to those gullible enough
to accept him at face value. Still, his cynicism and contempt
for the West-and for Wallace-were apparent.
What
was said off camera was even more interesting. In an Associated
Press story on August 9, a day after the interview with
Ahmadinejad, but four days before it aired on 60 Minutes,
it became apparent that Wallace was quite taken by the
Iranian leader. Wallace called him "an impressive fellow," "smart
as hell," and "more rational than I had expected."
Other
reports had Wallace calling him a "reasonable" man and
that he is not anti-Semitic, just anti-Zionist. Wallace
apparently believed Ahmadinejad's claim that he hopes for
peaceful co-existence between Iran and the West.
In a
radio interview with Sean Hannity, Wallace rejected any
comparison of Ahmadinejad to Hitler. And in response to
Hannity noting his repeated calls for "wiping out" Israel,
the following exchange took place:
MW:
Yes, he says wipe off the map, and of course I asked
him over and over about that. He says in effect, hey,
it's perfectly sensible to do...pardon me. It's perfectly
sensible for them, and I'm not quoting directly, obviously,
because I don't have the translation in front of me,
to...for them to...it's perfectly sensible, if there
is a Holocaust, and let's buy the fact that there was
a Holocaust. Where did the Holocaust take place? Did
it take place in an Arab neighborhood? Did it take place
in Jerusalem? No. It took place in Germany. Then it seems
to me, under those circumstances, take Israel, the Zionist
entity, he called it, move it to Germany. Move it to
Europe. That's where it happened.
SH:
Do you agree with him?
MW:
Move it to the United States.
SH:
Do you think that's a legitimate argument?
MW:
It's an argument. I'm not a commentator. You are.
It is
apparent that Wallace, for some reason, came under Ahmadinejad's
spell. This demonstrates that the Iranian leader is a force
to be reckoned with. If he can fool Mike Wallace, perhaps
he can deceive U.S. and European diplomats. Perhaps he
already has. CRO