The Bush
exit strategy, which does not include an artificial deadline,
is that as Iraqi forces stand up, American and Allied forces
can step down. The decision to remove our troops will be
based on the conditions on the ground, not some arbitrary
date.
Kerry,
who on NBC's Meet the Press announced that he now supports
Sen. Russ Feingold's call for censuring President Bush,
said that May 15, which is five months after the December
2005 parliamentary elections in Iraq, should be plenty
of time to have formed a unity government. This figure
of five months has been repeated over and over in the media
to suggest the political parties in Iraq are unable to
move forward. But the fact is that at the time Kerry wrote
his piece for the Times, and appeared on Meet the Press,
it had been less than two months since the results of the
election had been finalized, and that was followed shortly
thereafter by the bombing of the Golden Mosque in Samara.
In the aftermath, both the Sunnis and the Shi'ites have
shown great restraint, and a desire to make the process
work.
Here
are the facts: three national elections took place on time
last year. The three sides, including the Kurds, have shown
a desire to create a peaceful, democratic society. Former
dictator Saddam Hussein is on trial. Progress is being
made. A new government has been formed.
Gen.
Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, reported
in April that in one year, the Iraqi army had gone from
a handful of battalions to almost 130, and from almost
no brigades or divisions to more than 30 brigades and eight
to 10 divisions. He added that "83 percent of all operations
are led solely by Iraqis or Iraqis and coalition forces,
with the other 17 percent being coalition-only (operations)."
Despite
this progress, Kerry keeps talking about artificial and
arbitrary deadlines. Perhaps Kerry is trying to take attention
off his current legal and public relations problems, as
he weighs his options heading into the 2008 Democratic
primaries. He has recently created a controversial defense
fund to cover his legal expenses in a defamation
lawsuit filed last fall by Carlton Sherwood, former
marine, Pulitzer-prize-winning journalist and producer
of "Stolen Honor," the film that caused so much controversy just
before the presidential election of 2004.
The film
provided accounts of several former POWs from the Vietnam
War who talked about how John Kerry's Senate testimony
in 1971 adversely impacted their time in captivity in the "Hanoi
Hilton" prison camp. Sherwood interviewed 17 former POWs
for the film, who spent a combined total of 109 years and
three months in captivity. The film criticized Kerry for
his role in organizing the Winter Soldier investigation
for the Vietnam Veterans Against the War. In statements
that are now seen as gross exaggerations if not lies, Kerry
had told a Senate committee that he and others had committed
crimes and atrocities during the Vietnam War "on a day-to-day
basis with the full awareness of officers at all levels
of command." Kerry vividly described what he said that
Vietnam veterans had told at the investigation: that "they
had personally raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped
wires from portable telephones to human genitals and turned
up the power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly
shot at civilians, razed villages in fashion reminiscent
of Genghis Khan…"
When
Sinclair Broadcasting announced its intention to air the
documentary, the liberal-left was so concerned that it
could adversely affect Kerry's run for the presidency in
2004 that it waged a multi-faceted pressure campaign complete
with threats of government action and investor lawsuits.
That resulted in Sinclair deciding instead to air a one-hour
special on the topic that included just over five minutes
of "Stolen Honor."
Sherwood's
lawsuit accuses Kerry of being part of a conspiracy to
discredit and silence Sherwood and "Stolen Honor" through
a campaign of falsehoods. You can learn more about this
important case by visiting the website of
the Vietnam Veterans Legacy Foundation. CRO